A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Modern PhilosophyCushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy
A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Modern Philosophy
Cushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy -- History
The desire of the period to find a
greater unity in life was responded to by him in a mathematical
mysticism. To him the universe is not only divided into parts, not
only is there no opposition between God and the world, but life is so
completely a rational thing that no exceptional phenomena can occur.
He believed that any description of God or of nature in anthropomorphic
terms disunites life. Spinoza dehumanized the universe, conceiving
matter to consist of elements, and conceiving spirit to consist of
simple ideas. He resolved the personality of man into parts for the
sake of the unity of the universe, and he obtained scientific clearness
at the expense of humanity. Thus, instead of being able to say with
Descartes, “I think and therefore I am,” Spinoza could say, and wished
only to say, “God thinks” (_Deus cogitat_).
Like the usual speculative mystic, Spinoza described his God in the
terms of formal deductive logic. God is the most real being, _ens
realissimum_. What is the most real being to a mystic? Would reality
contain any finite quality such as the world around us contains? Can
you say that God has this particular faculty, or is endowed with that
concrete attribute? Does God enjoy, love, hate; does He create and
destroy? But how can God be the real unity of the world unless He
contains in Himself everything in the finite world? We approach here
the threshold of _the problem of the concrete universal_, which has
engaged the attention of so much of modern philosophy. A concrete
universal is all-inclusive of finite existence, but at the same time is
a self-consistent unity. In contrast with the concrete universal is the
abstract universal, which is a unity, but outside of which all finite
existence falls. While it was undoubtedly the concrete universal that
Spinoza sought, his method could lead to nothing more concrete than
the abstract universals of Plato and the Schoolmen. The world of finite
things is included by Spinoza’s God in the same way that blocks are
included by a string which has been tied around them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account