A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Modern PhilosophyCushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy
A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Modern Philosophy
Cushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy -- History
2. Leibnitz next examined the scientific conception of the atom.
Gassendi, one of that celebrated group of Parisian scientists, had
been the author of the introduction of Greek atomism into modern
thought. It had been generally accepted by scientists and combined with
the mathematical hypothesis of Galileo. Leibnitz had known Gassendi
in Paris, and he took the hard, inelastic atoms of Gassendi under
examination. He agreed that the atomist was perfectly correct in saying
that material bodies consist of simple parts or atoms. But Leibnitz
insisted that the atomist erred in thinking such simple parts to be
physical. However simple the parts might physically appear to be,
they were not really simple. However small a bit of matter may be, it
may be divided again, and the dividing process may go on to infinity.
The atom is the extended, and the extended cannot be simple or real.
Substance must be unextended, and the materialists were wrong in
attributing substance to the extended. Is there anything simple that
has a qualitative character? Is there anything real below the physical
atoms? Yes, the metaphysical atoms. The indivisible, immaterial unit
lies beneath the physical atom, and in order to reach it we must
pass beneath the physical into the metaphysical. This immaterial
or metaphysical atom is called by Leibnitz the _monad_; and thus is
Leibnitz’s theory called _monadology_.
There are three kinds of points, or units, or “simples.” There is the
mathematical point, which is simple enough, but it is only imaginary.
There is the physical point, or atom, which is real but not simple.
There is, lastly, the metaphysical point, or monad, which is both real
and simple. The metaphysical point is the only true point. To call the
material atoms real, only shows “the feebleness of the imagination,
which is glad to rest, and is, therefore, in haste to make an end of
division and analysis.”
3. Leibnitz then identified force, as the substance of motion, with the
metaphysical atom, as the substance of the material atom. The result
was the monad, as he conceived it. The monads are the principles of
active working. They are the super-spatial and immaterial principles
in which the mechanical principles of the universe have their roots and
meaning. Nature is not dead; it is not merely extended. It is alive,
resistant, and reproductive. If, as Spinoza taught, there were only one
substance, nature would be non-resistant and passive. But as a matter
of fact there are many substances acting for themselves, many bodies
resisting other bodies. They are the centres of separate activity, and
there are as many forces as there are things. There is no body without
movement, no movement without force. Thus does Leibnitz reintroduce
vitalism in a maturer form than is seen in neo-Platonism. Life becomes
the principle of nature. Purpose is placed at the centre of things.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account