A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Modern PhilosophyCushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy
A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Modern Philosophy
Cushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy -- History
=The Double Nature of the Monads.= The student will find that the
philosophy of Leibnitz is spoken of as a pluralism, but the student
will also find that Leibnitz devoted nearly all his strength to prove
that the world is after all a unity. Leibnitz analyzed the world into
a plural number of parts, and the question then with him was, how to
put these parts together again in an organic unity. This accomplishment
would depend a good deal upon his conception of the nature of the parts.
The monads have a double character. Leibnitz conceived the monad (1) as
a force centre and (2) as an immaterial soul. This makes an equivalence
of psychical and physical attributes which reminds us of the Stoics’
“fiery reason” of God. The word “force,” as Leibnitz uses it, squints
both toward physics and toward psychology. But such ambiguity about the
monads, the cornerstones in Leibnitz’s philosophy, assists Leibnitz’s
reconciliation at the start. Here, in a miniature, the physical and
spiritual lie in unity. The monad is conceived as a _soul-atom_.
Leibnitz came to philosophy with a mind saturated with the mathematical
ideas of the continuous, the infinitesimal, and the possible. He
thought of the monads as potentialities or possibilities. He looked
upon the world as essentially a developing world. Behind the facts
that seem to us inflexible, lies the great world of generating force.
Explanation of the actual can be made only in view of what the actual
may be and has been. Let us enlarge the scope of man by so widening his
conception of the actual that it will include the possible. Leibnitz
also spoke of the monads as infinitesimal. He thereby lifted the
conception of the infinitesimal from the realm of mathematics into
that of metaphysics, just as Hobbes universalized the conception of
mechanics by lifting it to metaphysics. Leibnitz, therefore, did not
regard the limits of perception as the limits of nature: the reality
of a nature object must be too small to be the object of perception. In
the same way he made use of his mathematical conception of continuity.
Leibnitz’s conception of nature-continuity is one of his contributions
to philosophy. Within itself the world of nature consists of a
continuous gradation from the lower to the higher forms; and also the
world of nature is continuous with the world of the spirit. There are
no leaps in the series from matter to God. Seeming differences in kind
are only differences in degree; for example, evil is only the absence
of good; matter is only an obscure idea of spirit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account