A Body of Divinity, Vol. 1 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 1 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
“IV. That no ancient writing, which is attested as these epistles are,
hath had its authenticity disproved, or is in fact questioned. The
controversies which have been moved concerning suspected writings, as
the epistles, for instance, of Phalaris, or the eighteen epistles of
Cicero, begin by showing that this attestation is wanting. That being
proved, the question is thrown back upon internal marks of
spuriousness or authenticity; and in these the dispute is occupied. In
which disputes it is to be observed, that the contested writings are
commonly attacked by arguments drawn from some opposition which they
betray to ‘authentic history,’ to ‘true epistles,’ to ‘the real
sentiments or circumstances of the author whom they personate[33];’
which authentic history, which true epistles, which real sentiments
themselves, are no other than ancient documents, whose early existence
and reception can be proved, in the manner in which the writings
before us are traced up to the age of their reputed author, or to ages
near to his. A modern who sits down to compose the history of some
ancient period, has no stronger evidence to appeal to for the most
confident assertion, or the most undisputed fact, that he delivers,
than writings, whose genuineness is proved by the same medium through
which we evince the authenticity of ours. Nor, whilst he can have
recourse to such authorities as these, does he apprehend any
uncertainty in his accounts, from the suspicion of spuriousness or
imposture in his materials.
“V. It cannot be shown that any forgeries, properly so called[34],
that is, writings published under the name of the person who did not
compose them, made their appearance in the first century of the
Christian æra, in which century these epistles undoubtedly existed. I
shall set down under this proposition the guarded words of Lardner
himself: ‘There are no quotations of any books of them (spurious and
apocryphal books) in the apostolical fathers, by whom I mean Barnabas,
Clement of Rome, Hermas, Ignatius, and Polycarp, whose writings reach
from the year of our Lord 70 to the year 108. _I say this confidently,
because I think it has been proved._’ Lardner, vol. xii. p. 158.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account