A Body of Divinity, Vol. 1 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 1 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
Nevertheless, when this respect to future blessedness is warrantable, it
must be considered as an expedient for our glorifying God, while we
behold his glory; and when we consider it as a reward, we must not look
upon it as what is merited by our service, or conferred in a way of
debt, but as a reward of grace, given freely to us, though founded on
the merits of Christ.
Footnote 4:
He who glorifies God intentionally, thereby promotes his own
happiness. Our enjoying God is glorifying him. The two objects
coalesce. Vide note on page 19.
Footnote 5:
The answer connected with this question makes the glorifying and
enjoyment but _one_ end; and thus the enjoyment is supposed to consist
in the glorifying God.
Footnote 6:
It is not probable that the idea of a _book of life_, which is not to
be understood literally, was at all in use in the days of Moses. The
term ηυχομην used by Paul is not hypothetical, but affirmative, and in
the past tense, _I did wish_, or rather _I was wishing_ to be
separated from Christ. The truth of this assertion no one, who is
acquainted with his history, can doubt; for he had been a persecutor.
Such a wish, made after he was a subject of saving grace, would have
been unnatural, irrelevant, impious and impossible. It has been
nevertheless, zealously contended by some learned and pious modern
divines that, “the benevolent person is disposed, and willing to give
up, and relinquish his own interest and happiness, when inconsistent
with the public good, or the greatest good of the whole.”[7] By
_benevolence_ they mean love to being in general, without regard to
any excellency in that being, “unless mere existence”[8] be such. In
this they place all virtue, and all religion. And that they may the
more clearly distinguish this species of love from that of
_complacency_ and _gratitude_, in which the party ever has his eye
upon his own advantage, they usually adopt the phrase _disinterested
benevolence_, yet not wholly discarding the idea of the party’s own
interest, but viewing it only on the general scale with that of all
other beings.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account