A Body of Divinity, Vol. 3 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 3 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
_James._ I must acknowledge that on this subject I feel considerably
at a loss, I have no consciousness of having ever called the doctrine
of substitution in question. On the contrary, my hope of salvation
rests upon it; and the sum of my delight, as a minister of the gospel,
consists in it. If I know any thing of my own heart, I can say of my
Saviour as laying down his life _for, or instead of_ sinners, as was
said of Jerusalem by the captives—_If I forget_ THEE, _let my right
hand forget: If I do not remember_ THEE, _let my tongue cleave to the
roof of my mouth_!
I have always considered the denial of this doctrine as being of the
essence of Socinianism. I could not have imagined that any person
whose hope of acceptance with God rests not on any goodness in himself
but entirely on the righteousness of Christ, imputed to him _as if it
were his own_, would have been accounted to disown his substitution.
But perhaps, my dear brother, (for such I feel him to be,
notwithstanding our differences,) may include in his ideas of this
subject, that Christ was so our _head_ and _representative_, as that
what he did and suffered, we did and suffered in him.—If no more were
meant by this, resumed James, than that what he did and suffered is
graciously accepted on our behalf _as if it were ours_, I freely, as I
have said before, acquiesce in it. But I do not believe, and can
hardly persuade myself that brother Peter believes, the obedience and
sufferings of Christ to be so ours, as that we can properly be said to
have obeyed and suffered.
Christ was and is our _head_, and we are his members: the union
between him and us, however, is not in all respects the same as that
which is between the head and the members of the natural body: for
that would go to explain away all distinct consciousness and
accountableness on our part.
As to the term _representative_, if no more be meant by it than that
Christ so personated us as to die in our stead, that we, believing in
him, should not die, I have nothing to object to it. But I do not
believe that Christ was so our representative, as that what he did and
suffered, we did and suffered; and so became meritorious, or deserving
of the divine favour.—But I feel myself in a wide field, and must
entreat your indulgence while I take up so much of the conversation.
_Peter and John._ Go on, and state your sentiments without apology.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account