A Body of Divinity, Vol. 3 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 3 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
This influence is sight to the blind, hearing to the deaf, riches to
the poor, health to the sick, and life to the dead. It is not
incompatible with moral agency, for the holy disposition is as free in
its operation, as the former sinful inclinations had been in theirs.
The necessity of it to salvation, is no excuse for the impenitent;
grace is not necessary to the vindication of Divine justice: the
preponderancy of inclinations to evil is the essence of, not an
apology for sin. It is very strange if, because a man is so intent
upon sinning that nothing can change him but the almighty power of the
Divine Spirit, he is on this very account innocent.—It does not render
the preaching of the word unnecessary, for besides that it is
commanded, and important to call men to repentance and faith, when the
grace has been given, God also usually accompanies his ordinances with
his Spirit’s influences, and seems in most cases, to direct in his
providence the blessings of his instructions to those whom he makes
the subjects of his grace.
Footnote 16:
“I have seen it objected, that to suppose a change effected in the
heart of man, otherwise than by the power of moral means, is palpably
absurd; as implying an evident impossibility in the nature of things.
It has been said, by a divine of advanced age, and good sense; ‘The
moral change of the mind in regeneration, is of an essentially
different kind from the mechanical change of the body, when that is
raised from the dead; and must be effected by the exertion of a
different kind of power. Each effect requires a power suited to its
nature: and the power proper for one can never produce the other. To
argue from one to the other of these effects, as the apostle has been
misunderstood to do, in Eph. i. 20, is therefore idle and
impertinent.—The Spirit of God is possessed of these two kinds of
power, and exerts the one or the other, accordingly as he wills to
produce a change of the moral or physical kind, in moral beings or
inanimate matter.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account