A Body of Divinity, Vol. 3 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 3 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
Righteousness is taken ordinarily to signify a conformity to laws, or
rules of right conduct. Actions, and persons may respectively be
denominated righteous. The moral law, which is both distinguishable by
the moral sense, and expressly revealed, requires perfect and
perpetual rectitude in disposition, purpose, and action. Because none
are absolutely conformed to this law, none can fairly claim to be in
themselves, simply, and absolutely righteous. Men are said therefore
to be righteous comparatively, or because the defects of many of their
actions are few, or not discernible by their fellow men. _To be made_,
(or constituted) _righteous_, or, to _be justified_, in the sight of
God, in scriptural language cannot mean, _to be made inherently
righteous_. It is God who justifies, he cannot call evil good, and
cannot be ignorant of every man’s real demerit. This righteousness of
the saint has not consisted, under any dispensation, in his own
conformity to the Divine law; “_In the Lord have I righteousness_;”
“_That I may win Christ and be found in him, not having my own
righteousness_.” If it did, there would be no necessity for the aid of
God’s Spirit to sanctify the nature of the justified person. To be
justified or constituted righteous, is therefore to be _treated and
accepted as righteous_. If God _justifies the ungodly_, his truth and
justice must be clear. He cannot be induced to depart from perfect
rectitude, and strict propriety. When the ungodly are justified, or
treated as if righteous, it is not on their own account, for their
righteousness is defective; but _by the obedience of one_, (that is
Christ,) _many are made righteous_. The term _obedience_ excludes the
essential righteousness of Christ as God. And his righteousness which
he rendered in our nature can neither be transfused into, nor
transferred unto his people, so as to be theirs inherently. Nor can an
infinitely wise God consider the righteousness of one man to be the
personal righteousness of another. But one person may receive
advantages from the righteousness of another. Sodom would have been
spared if there could have been found ten holy men in it. Millions may
be treated kindly, because of favour or respect had for one of their
number espousing the cause of the whole. One man may become the surety
of, and perform conditions for many, or pay a ransom for them, and
purchase them from slavery. If it be said that one may not lay down
his life, especially if it be important, for the preservation of
another’s; yet Christ was the _Lord of life_ and possessed what no
mere creature can, the right to lay down his life, and power to take
it up again. The importance of the satisfaction should be adequate to
the honour of the law. But that every objection to such substitution
might be removed, it is shewn that, this was the very condition upon
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account