A Body of Divinity, Vol. 4 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 4 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
excluded, because God’s internal discipline exceeds all human
disciplines, which rejected these kind of instruments.” _Cit._ Hoffm.
Lex. voce _Musica_.
If any one objects the practice of some foreign churches, I answer
with Mr. _Hickman_: “They are laid aside by most of the reformed
churches; nor would they be retained among the _Lutherans_, unless
they had forsaken their own _Luther_; who, by the confession of
Eckard, reckoned _organs among the ensigns of Baal_. That they still
continue in some of the _Dutch_ churches, is against the minds of the
Pastors. For in the National Synod at _Middleburg_, in the year 1581,
and in the Synod of _Holland_ and _Zealand_, in the year 1594, it was
resolved, _That they would endeavour to obtain of the magistrate the
laying aside of organs, and the singing with them in the churches,
even out of the time of worship, either before or after sermons_: so
far are those Synods from bearing with them in the worship itself.”
_Apol. p._ 139.
The Church of _England_ herself had formerly no very good opinion of
these musical instruments; as may appear by her Homilies: “Lastly,
God’s vengeance hath been, and is daily provoked, because much wicked
people pass nothing to resort unto the church; either for that they
are so sore blinded, that they understand nothing of God or godliness,
and care not with devilish malice to offend their neighbours; or else
for that they see the church altogether scoured of such gay gazing
sights, as their gross phantasie was greatly delighted with; because
they see the false religion abandoned, and the true restored, which
seemeth an unsavory thing to their unsavory taste, as may appear by
this that a woman said to her neighbour: Alas! gossip, what shall we
now do at church, since all the Saints are taken away; since all the
goodly sights we were wont to have are gone; since we cannot hear the
like piping, singing, Chaunting, and playing upon the organs that we
could before? But, dearly beloved, we ought greatly to rejoice and
give God thanks, that our churches are delivered out of all those
things, which displeased God so sore, and filthily defiled his holy
house, and his place of prayer.” Hom. of the place and time of prayer,
_part._ 2. p. 131.
A great number also of the Clergy in the first convocation of Queen
_Elizabeth_ in 1562, earnestly laboured to have organs, and that
pompous theatrical way of singing laid aside, and missed the carrying
it but by one vote, as I observe elsewhere. And in this Archbishop
_Parker_ concurred with them, or at least did not oppose them.
I will add one or two testimonies of Papists against this cathedral
way of worship. The first shall be _Polydorus Virgilius_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account