A Body of Divinity, Vol. 4 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 4 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
3. The objection implies an _ungrateful_ reflexion on the Institutor’s
wisdom and goodness, contrary to what it pretends to avoid. And this
it does, by counteracting and vilifying those natural dictates of
reason, prudence and common sense, that our all-wise and beneficent
Creator has given us—his _goodness_, in not suspending their
operations, but leaving them in full force, as to these circumstances
of positive duties—his _wisdom_, in grafting what is positive of his
laws on these common principles—and finally, the favourable
circumstance of his diminishing the degree of positiveness in New
Testament institutions, as well as their number.
Let us now recapitulate what has been said in this chapter—From an
investigation of the _nature_ of positive precepts and duties, as
distinguished from _moral_ ones, together with their _comparative_
obligations and importance, we have seen, that, in any case of
supposed competition, the _latter_ claims an undoubted _preference_.
We have also seen, that nothing but absolute, decisive, _discernible
authority_ can turn the scale in favor of the _former_, or, indeed,
place any law or duty in the rank of POSITIVE. Moreover, it has been
shewn, that every duty resulting from any discernible _moral
relation_, must needs be classed among _moral duties_; that some
things appertaining to the very _essence_ of baptism, on our
opponents’ own principles, are of moral consideration; particularly
the qualifications of proper subjects; consequently, that baptism is
an ordinance of a _mixed nature_, partly positive and partly moral. Of
all which an unavoidable consequence is, that our opponents’ outcry
against all _moral_ and _analogical reasons_ in our enquiries
respecting the subjects and mode of baptism, is impertinent and
absurd, and to a demonstration contradictory to their own avowed
principles.
DR. WILLIAMS ON BAPTISM.
Footnote 77:
The commission to disciples _baptizing all nations_ is both a
positive and express authority for the baptism of the infants of such
as are themselves discipled.
Footnote 78:
_See his works: vol. II. pag. 1129, 1132, 1133._
Footnote 79:
_Vid. Just. Martyr, Quest. & Resp. Quest. CII. & ejusd. Apol. II._
Footnote 80:
_Vid. Cyp. in Epist. ad Fid. Lib. iii. Epi. viii._
Footnote 81:
_Vid. Iren. Lib. ii. xxxix._
Footnote 82:
_Vid. Ejusd. Orat. xl._
Footnote 83:
_Vid. Augustin. de peccat. merit. & remiss. Lib. i. Cap. xxviii.
parvulos baptizandos esse concedunt qui contra autoritatem universæ
ecclesiæ proculdubio per dominum, & Apostolos traditam venire non
possunt; and in Sermon. x. de verbis Apostol, speaking concerning
infant-baptism, he says, Nemo vobis susurret doctrinas alienas. Hoc
ecclesia semper habuit. semper tenuit; hoc a majorum fide percepit:
hoc usque in finem perseveranter custodit._
Footnote 84:
_Vid. Tertul. Lib. de Baptism, Cap. xviii._
Footnote 85:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account