A Body of Divinity, Vol. 4 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 4 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
On February 9th, 1705, the clergy of England, assembled in general
convention, “_ordered_, that the thanks of this house be given to Mr.
Wall, vicar of Shoreham in Kent, for the learned and excellent book he
hath lately written concerning infant-baptism; and that a committee be
appointed to acquaint him with the same.” Dr. Atterbury, a leading
member in said convention, says, “that the history of infant-baptism
was a book, for which the author deserved the thanks, not of the
English clergy alone, but of all the Christian churches.” Mr. Whiston
also, a very learned man, well acquainted with the writings of the
Fathers of the four first centuries, and a professed Baptist, in his
address to the people of that denomination, declares to them, “that
Dr. Wall’s history of _infant-baptism_, as to facts, appeared to him
most accurately done, and might be depended on by the Baptists
themselves.” _Mem. of his life_, part 2, page 461.
The aforesaid history is still extant in two volumes. The same author
has since published another volume, which is a defence of the two
former volumes, against the reflections of Dr. Gale and others. In
these publications, he has favoured us with the testimony and sayings
of the ancient Fathers, with respect to infant-baptism, a few of which
I shall produce, as authorities on the present occasion.
Justin Martyr, who wrote about forty years after the apostolic age,
says, “We have not received the carnal but spiritual circumcision, by
baptism. And it is enjoined on all persons to receive it in the same
way.” He here evidently considers baptism as being in the place of
circumcision, and, consequently, like that ancient rite, designed for
infants as well as for adults. In one of his apologies for the
christians, he observes, “Several persons among us, of sixty or
seventy years old, who were made disciples to Christ from their
childhood, do continue uncorrupt.”—_Who were made disciples._—Take
notice; for he makes use of the very same word that was used in the
commission given to the apostles. _Disciple all nations, baptizing
them_, &c. Now, if infant children were made disciples, they were
undoubtedly baptized. Justin wrote about 105 years after the ascension
of Christ. Those persons whom he mentions were then 70 years old; and
consequently born and made disciples, in the times of the apostles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account