A Body of Divinity, Vol. 4 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 4 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
Pelagius held, that infants were born free from any natural and sinful
defilements. The chief opposers of him and his adherents were Saint
Hierome, and Saint Austin, who constantly urged, very closely, in all
their writings upon the subject, the following argument, viz. “_That
infants are, by all christians, acknowledged to stand in need of
baptism, which must be in them for original sin, since they have no
other_.” “If they have no sin, why are they then baptized, according
to the rule of the church, _for the forgiveness of sins? Why are they
washed in the laver of regeneration, if they have no pollution?_”
Pelagius, and also Celestius, one of his principal abettors, were
extremely puzzled and embarrassed with this argument. They knew not
how to evade or surmount its force, but by involving themselves in
greater absurdities and difficulties. Some persons aggravated the
supposed error, by charging upon them the denial of infant-baptism, as
a consequence that followed from their tenet. Pelagius disclaimed the
slanderous imputation with abhorrence, declaring that he was accused
falsely. In the confession of faith, Pelagius then exhibited, which
Dr. Wall has recited, he owns, “_that baptism ought to be administered
to infants, with the same sacramental words which are used in the case
of adult persons_.”—He vindicates himself in the strongest terms,
saying, “_that men slander him as if he denied the sacrament of
baptism to infants, and did promise the kingdom of heaven to any
person without the redemption of Christ; and affirms that he never
heard of any, not even the most impious heretic, that would say such a
thing of infants_.” Now these difficulties would have been instantly
removed, and the battery, which so greatly annoyed them, been
demolished at once, by only denying that infants were to be baptized.
But they did not suggest or entertain any doubt at all respecting this
doctrine. Pelagius readily avowed, in the most explicit manner, the
incontested right, and the established immemorial practice of
infant-baptism. Celestius also confessed, “that infants were to be
baptized according to the _rule of the universal church_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account