“The singers were allowed innumerable licences. Whilst the tenor
sustained the Gregorian melody, the other voices indulged in
extempore descant, regardless of the style of the main composition,
violating time, and setting even the fundamental tone at defiance.
The composers, to advance another step in the analysis of this
strange medley, took particular delight in combining different
sets of words, melodies of widely diverse character, antagonistic
rhythms, and divergent systems of accentuation, in a single piece.
They assigned these several ingredients to several parts, and for the
further exhibition of their perverse skill, went even to the length
of coupling themes in the major and the minor. The most obvious
result of such practice was that it became impossible to understand
what was being sung, and that instead of concord and order in the
choir, a confused discord and anarchy of dinning sounds prevailed.
What made the matter, from an ecclesiastical point of view, still
worse, was that these scholastically artificial compositions were
frequently based on trivial and vulgar tunes, suggesting the tavern,
the dancing-room, or even worse places, to worshippers assembled
for the celebration of a Sacrament. Masses bore titles adopted from
the popular airs on which they were founded; such, for example, as
_Adieu, mes amours_, _À l’ombre d’un buissonnet_, _Baise moi_, _Le
vilain jaloux_. Even the words of love ditties and obscene ballads
were being squalled out by the tenor (treble?) while the bass
(tenor?) gave utterance to an _Agnus Dei_ or a _Benedictus_, and the
soprano (alto?) was engaged upon the verses of a Latin hymn. Baini,
who examined hundreds of the masses and motetts in MS., says that the
words imported into them from vulgar sources ‘make one’s flesh creep,
and one’s hair stand on end.’ He does not venture to do more than
indicate a few of the more decent of these interloping verses. As an
augmentation of this indecency, numbers from a mass which started with
the grave rhythm of a Gregorian tone were brought to their conclusion
on the dance measure of a popular _ballata_, so that _Incarnatus est_
or _Kyrie eleison_ went jigging off into suggestions of Masetto and
Zerlina at a village ball.”[3]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account