A Brief Account of the Educational Publishing Business in the United StatesPulsifer, William Edmond
History
A Brief Account of the Educational Publishing Business in the United States
Pulsifer, William Edmond
Publishers and publishing -- United States; Textbooks -- United States
reminding you only that the bulk of the book was composed of extracts
from the Bible, of hymns, and of moral teachings; that the backbone
of this book--misnamed a primer, for it was not a primer at all as
we now understand the term--was the Westminster Assembly’s Shorter
Catechism, which Cotton Mather called “a little watering-pot to shed
good lessons”; and lastly, that this primer was the only reader that
children had until they were able to read the Bible. As dreadful as
many of the doctrines taught in the Westminster Assembly’s Shorter
Catechism were, Cotton Mather urged writing masters to set sentences
from it to be copied by their pupils.
Comparing itself with this earliest American schoolbook, the modern
primer might, in the language of Chaucer, say without being guilty of
immodesty:
“O little booke, thou art so onconning,
How darst thou put thyself in prees for drede?”
George Fox, founder of the Society of Friends, published in 1674 a
Primer in England. This was republished in Philadelphia in 1701, in
Boston in 1743, and in Newport in 1769. The book was not much used
except by Friends.
The text matter of Jonathan Fisher’s _A Youth’s Primer_, printed
in 1817, followed closely the text of _The New England Primer_. It
contained a series of short stories in alphabetical order, each
followed by a religious, moral, or historical observation. The poor
youngsters who were forced to read, day after day, from the pages of
these early books, whose text matter was certainly lugubrious and
distressing, were constantly reminded of death, the grave, a wrathful
God, and a burning hell prepared for the wicked.
The text matter of the early Arithmetics, while not as gruesome as that
of the Readers, was in many respects so peculiar as to be quite beyond
the understanding of the twentieth century teacher. Allow me to call
your attention to two or three of the puzzling things contained in “Old
Pike,” as his Arithmetic was commonly known.
When tare and tret and doff are allowed:
Deduct the tare and tret, and divide the suttle by 168, and the
quotient will be the cloff, which subtract from the suttle, and
the remainder will be the neat.
These definitions will help you to understand the old terms:
_Tare_ is an allowance, made to the buyer, for the weight of the
box, barrel, or bag which contains, the goods bought.
_Tret_ is an allowance of 4 lbs. in every 104 lbs. for waste,
dust, etc.
_Cloff_ is an allowance of 2 lbs. upon every 3 cwt.
_Suttle_ is, when part of the allowance is deducted.
_Neat_ weight is what remains after all allowances are made.
The following rule is another of Pike’s puzzles. This tells how to find
the Gregorian Epact:
Subtract 11 from the Julian Epact. If the subtraction cannot
be made, add 30 to the Julian Epact, then subtract, and the
remainder will be the Gregorian Epact. If nothing remains, the
Epact is 29.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account