Of all the objects so far removed from the tomb, none has attracted
more attention, and none seems likely to create more controversy,
than the group of extraordinary gilt state couches, the Lion, Hathor,
and Typhon couches, as they came to be called. The thing which drew
attention to them was not their beauty, for anything more hideous it
is impossible to imagine; it was their strangeness. With Egyptian
couches and biers the world was pretty familiar before; but these were
widely different, with their quiet and shapely lines, from the barbaric
monstrosities of Tutankhamen’s tomb. The heads of the couches present,
indeed, some resemblances to familiar Egyptian types; but even so, the
suggestion which rises to the mind on viewing them is that these are
Egyptian types interpreted by an alien temperament and executed by
alien craftsmen. It seems almost impossible to believe that an Egyptian
craftsman, with his tradition of taste and restraint, would ever have
produced such abortions, calculated to produce nightmares instead of
slumber in those who tried to rest upon them.
Accordingly Professor Petrie has asserted that these couches are
not of Egyptian workmanship at all. No Egyptian workman, he says,
ever produced work assembled with bronze joints as these couches
are; they must have been produced in a distant country, and jointed
in this fashion for convenience of transport, being reassembled on
their arrival. Further, the decoration (trefoil) on one of them is
characteristically Babylonian. Therefore it seems probable that we
must look to Babylon for their origin; and Professor Petrie suggests
that these are the identical couches to which the Babylonian king
Kadashman-Enlil refers in one of the Tell el-Amarna letters, where he
says, writing to Amenhotep III, that he is sending to the Egyptian king
“a couch of _ushu_ wood, ivory and gold, three couches and six thrones
of _ushu_ and gold,” and other furniture.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account