A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
History
A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
American journal of science; Science -- United States -- History
In a general diffusion of useful information through the various
classes of society, in activity of intellect and fertility of resource
and invention, producing a highly intelligent population, we have no
reason to shrink from a comparison with any country. But the devoted
cultivators of science in the United States are comparatively few:
they are, however, rapidly increasing in number. Among them are
persons distinguished for their capacity and attainments, and,
notwithstanding the local feelings nourished by our state
sovereignties, and the rival claims of several of our larger cities,
there is evidently a predisposition towards a concentration of effort,
from which we may hope for the happiest results, with regard to the
advancement of both the science and reputation of our country.
Is it not, therefore, desirable to furnish some rallying point, some
object sufficiently interesting to be nurtured by common efforts, and
thus to become the basis of an enduring, common interest? To produce
these efforts, and to excite this interest, nothing, perhaps, bids
fairer than a SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL.
The valuable work already accomplished by various medical journals is
then spoken of and particularly that of the first scientific periodical
in the United States, Bruce’s Mineralogical Journal. This, as Silliman
says (=1=, p. 3, 1818), although “both in this country and in Europe
received in a very flattering manner,” did not survive the death of its
founder, and only a single volume of 270 pages appeared (1810–1813).
Silliman continues:
No one, it is presumed, will doubt that a journal devoted to science,
and embracing a sphere sufficiently extensive to allure to its support
the principal scientific men of our country, is greatly needed; if
cordially supported, it will be successful, and if successful, it will
be a great public benefit.
Even a failure, in so good a cause, (unless it should arise from
incapacity or unfaithfulness,) cannot be regarded as dishonourable. It
may prove only that the attempt was premature, and that our country is
not yet ripe for such an undertaking; for without the efficient
support of talent, knowledge, and money, it cannot long proceed. No
editor can hope to carry forward such a work without the active aid of
scientific and practical men; but, at the same time, the public have a
right to expect that he will not be sparing of his own labour, and
that his work shall be generally marked by the impress of his own
hand. To this extent the editor cheerfully acknowledges his
obligations to the public; and it will be his endeavour faithfully to
redeem his pledge.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account