A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
History
A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
American journal of science; Science -- United States -- History
great work of Zirkel[124] began to appear, which sums up so completely
the results of the petrographic era. Rosenbusch[125] was formulating
more definitely his views on the division of rocks into magmatic groups,
as displayed by their associations in the field, and using this in
classification; an idea which, appearing first in the second edition of
his “Physiographie der massigen Gesteine,” finds fuller development in
the third and last editions of this work. In this country Iddings[126]
published an important paper, in which the family relationships of
igneous rocks and the derivation of diverse groups from a common magma
by differentiation are clearly brought out. The fundamental problems
underlying the genesis of igneous rocks had now been clearly recognized,
and with this recognition the science passed into the petrologic phase.
Brögger[127] also had ascribed to the alkalic rocks of South Norway a
common parentage and had pointed out their regional peculiarities.
From this time forward an attempt may be noted to find an analogy
between rocks and the forms of organic life and to apply those
principles of evolution and descent, which have proved so fruitful in
the advancement of the biological sciences, to the genesis and
classification of igneous rocks. This, perhaps, has on the whole been
more apparent than real, in the constant borrowing of terms from those
sciences to express certain features and relationships observed, or
imagined, to obtain among rocks. Nevertheless, the perception of certain
relations which we owe so largely to Rosenbusch and to Brögger[128] has
proved of undoubted value in furnishing a stimulus for the investigation
of new regions, and in affording indications of what the petrologist
should anticipate in his work.
Thus, the labors of the men previously mentioned, with those of Bayley,
Bascom, Cushing, Daly, Lane, Lawson, Lindgren, Pirsson, J. F. Williams,
Washington, and others, have thrown a flood of light upon the igneous
rocks of this continent, and has made it possible to draw many broad
generalizations concerning their origin and distribution. Thus, the
differentiated laccoliths of Montana[129] have been of service in
affording clear examples of the process of local differentiation. Many
papers published in the Journal during the last twenty years show this
evolution and growth of petrological ideas. The contributions from
American sources during this later period, and of which those in the
Journal form a considerable fraction, have indeed been of great weight
in shaping the development and future of the science.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account