A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
History
A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
American journal of science; Science -- United States -- History
_Permian of the United States._—In Europe, previous to 1841, the
formations now classed as Permian were included in the New Red
Sandstone, and with the Carboniferous were referred to the Secondary. In
that year Murchison proposed the period term Permian. In 1845 came the
classic Geology of Russia in Europe and the Ural Mountains, by
Murchison, Keyserling, and De Verneuil. In this great work the authors
separated out of the New Red the Magnesian Limestone of Great Britain
and the Rothliegende marls, Kupferschiefer, and Zechstein of Germany,
and with other formations of the Urals in Russia, referred them to the
Permian system. This step, one of the most discerning in historical
geology, was all the more important because they closed the Paleozoic
era with the Permian, beginning the Secondary, or Mesozoic, with the New
Red Sandstone or the Triassic period. There is a good review of this
work by D. D. Owen (1807–1860) in the Journal for 1847 (=3=, 153).
Owen, though accepting the Permian system, is not satisfied with its
reference to the Paleozoic, and he sets the matter forth in the Journal
(=3=, 365, 1847). He doubts “the propriety of a classification which
throws the Permian and Carboniferous systems into the Paleozoic period.”
This is mainly because there is no “evidence of disturbance or
unconformability” between the Permian and Triassic systems. Rather
“there is so complete a blending of adjacent strata” that it is only in
Russia that the Permian has been distinguished from the Triassic. This
view of Owen’s was not only correct for Russia but even more so for the
Alps and for India, and it has taken a great deal of work and discussion
to fix upon the disconformable contact that distinguishes the Paleozoic
from the Mesozoic in these areas. In other words, there was here at this
time no mountain making. Then Owen goes on to state that because the
Permian of Europe has reptiles, he sees in them decisive Mesozoic
evidence. “These are certainly strong arguments in favor of placing, not
only the Permian, but also the Carboniferous group in the Mesozoic
period, and terminating the Paleozoic division with the commencement of
the coal measures.” To this harking backward the geologists of the world
have not agreed, but have followed the better views of Murchison and his
associates.
In 1855 G. G. Shumard discovered, and in 1860 his brother B. F. Shumard
(1820–1869) announced, the presence of Permian strata in the Guadalupe
Mountains of Texas, and in 1902 George H. Girty (=14=, 363) confirmed
this. Girty regards the faunas as younger than any other late Paleozoic
ones of America, and says: “For this reason I propose to give them a
regional name, which shall be employed in a force similar to
Mississippian and Pennsylvanian.... The term Guadalupian is suggested.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account