Cabinet system -- Great Britain -- Fiction; English fiction -- 20th century; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- Fiction
It had cognizance of all Escheats, Novels Tabulate and Malprisions
Reguardaunt in the County of Ponthieu and the Seniory of Lucq. But when
active jurisdiction over these continental territories was interrupted
under King Henry VI., there remained no function for the Court but the
trial of cases arising in or without foreign ports upon decks subject
to the Crown of England.
It lingered thus into the beginning of the sixteenth century, at
which moment it was reduced to a Clerk known as the _Mangeur_, and a
Warden, each holding what were virtually sinecures (and not highly paid
sinecures at that) about the Palace.
Henry VIII., whom we cannot call a good but whom surely we may call a
great man, rudely suppressed the office of Mangeur with a cruel jest
at the executioner’s expense, and only permitted the Wardenship itself
to survive on the strict understanding that the salary should be paid
to himself. The title, however, remained, a minor distinction among
the numerous baubles of the time, and was, if I may so express it,
resurrected from obscurity by the great family of Heygate at the moment
of the Restoration of Charles II.
In their gladness at their recovery of a legitimate sovereign, this
dominant house (now represented by the Parrells) trapped themselves in
every accoutrement of joy, and, among other posts, the Wardenship of
the Court of Dowry was voted in 1661 an annual salary of £2000, for
which sum held by the same Act as an hereditary right, the head of the
House of Heygate was content to license the annual holding of the Court
within the Royal Manor and Liberties of Tooting.
At first this Court sat for one full day in each year--St. Luke’s--but
later, from 1731, this session was maintained in fiction alone. A crier
in Westminster Hall, at the opening of every Hilary Term, would rapidly
read out a list of three fictitious cases which went by default, claim
seventeen and sixpence, and for ever after hold his peace.
During the eighteenth century the fixed yearly salary of £2000
hereditarily enjoyed by the Heygate family steadily grew, till, by
the time of the Reform Bill, it had reached the very considerable sum
of £15,000, still payable to the Heygates though now all vestige of
activity in the office had disappeared.
Our grandfathers, in the zeal of that somewhat iconoclastic moment,
swept away the corrupt figment. The emoluments of the post were
ruthlessly cut down to the original £2000; its hereditary character
was, after a violent debate in the House of Lords, destroyed by a
majority of over fifty votes, determined (as were so many of the great
changes of that time!) by the voice of Eldon. The Detainer of the
office (for such was his official title) received in compensation
a lump sum of half a million only--not twenty years’ purchase--and
certain apparently unimportant functions were attached to the place
which from that day forward became an appointment changing with the
Administration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account