Books and reading; Children's literature -- Bibliography
natural and not artificial. Of a thousand persons of all ages who read
the “Iliad,” the hundred who get the most out of it will include men,
women, and children, some who have “higher” education and some who
have not, well-informed men and uninformed boys. The hundred will be
those who have the most imagination. The boy of fourteen who has an
active intelligence can understand Shakespeare better than the least
imaginative of those who have taken the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
in English at our universities. The man of imagination, even if he has
taken the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, will find deeper delight
and wisdom in Shakespeare than the uninformed boy. Readers differ
in individual capacities and in the extent of their experience in
intellectual matters. But class differences, especially school-made
differences, are swept away by the power of literature, which abhors
inessential distinctions and goes direct to the human intelligence.
The direct appeal of literature to the human intelligence and human
emotions is what we mean by our principle of union. Nothing can divorce
us from the poet if we have a spark of poetry in us. The contact of
mind between poet and reader is immediate, and is effected without any
go-between, any intercessor or critical negotiator.
Now, what happens to the principles of our declaration of independence
and the constitution of our democracy of readers when we open to a
page of one of Darwin’s works on biology, or a page of the philosopher
Plato, and find that we do not get the sense of it at all? We can
understand the “Iliad,” the “Book of Job,” “Macbeth,” “Faust”;
they mean _something_ to us, even if we do not receive their whole
import. But here, in two great thinkers who have influenced the whole
intellectual world, Plato and Darwin, we come upon pages that to us
mean absolutely nothing. The works of Plato and Darwin are certainly
literature. But they are something else besides: they are science, and
the understanding of them depends on a knowledge of the science that
went before the particular pages that are so meaningless to us. Here
is a kind of literature, the mere reading of which requires special
training.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account