A cityless and countryless world : $b An outline of practical cooperative individualismOlerich, Henry
Science
A cityless and countryless world : $b An outline of practical cooperative individualism
Olerich, Henry
Cooperation; Social problems -- Miscellanea
“But we would like to know,” said Viola, “in what manner this change
was brought about, so that we can make our intelligence here on earth,
too, count in that direction.”
“Of course, primitive man with his rude and unpolished intellect sees
nothing of this evil. The antagonistic propensities which man has
inherited during the fierce struggle for existence from his lower
ancestors, caused him to monopolize natural opportunity wherever he
could, because his intelligence was so low and narrow that to him the
material subsistence seemed to count for all, and the higher social and
industrial qualities counted for little or nothing. Such an intellect
can not see that one can not be happy as long as he is surrounded
by many who are ignorant and miserable. But with the unfolding of
higher and nobler sentiments, man, at last, clearly realized that no
person can really be wealthy in any world as long as a portion of his
fellowmen are pinched with poverty, oppressed by slavery, burdened
by ignorance and affected with filth and rudeness. He learned that
in order to have universal prosperity, high mental attainments and
cleanliness and purity, man must be free to apply his labor to land
wherever he finds some vacant.”
“But do you think,” asked Mrs. Uwins, “that the evil effects of owning
land by deed are as great when the population of a country or world is
sparse than if it be dense?”
“It may not be fully as great in the former as in the latter case, but
it is always one of the greatest evils and the most effectual hindrance
to universal progress. We have seen that in order to make industry most
productive, we must have a complete division of labor; and a complete
division of labor is possible only under an extensive and thorough
voluntary co-operation. But notice that the ownership of land by _deed_
creates or tends to create extensive landlords. Hence all individuals
must either be extensive landowners, or some are compelled to work
either directly or indirectly for the landlord. But if every individual
is an extensive landowner, population must necessarily be sparse;
and with a sparse population, extensive and thorough co-operation is
impossible, while, on the other hand, the laboring of some landless
individuals for the landlords, as you now have it and as we formerly
had it, causes land monopoly, which is the cause either directly or
indirectly of nearly all your social and industrial evils.”
“Yes, I clearly see the advantages of owning land by occupancy and use.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account