A Class Room Logic: Deductive and Inductive, with Special Application to the Science and Art of TeachingMcNair, George Hastings
Philosophy
A Class Room Logic: Deductive and Inductive, with Special Application to the Science and Art of Teaching
McNair, George Hastings
Logic
(11) Why should teachers be clear thinkers?
(12) Why should teachers be especially on guard against incorrect
statements of all kinds?
(13) Show how logic might be of assistance to the business man.
=8. QUESTIONS FOR ORIGINAL THOUGHT AND INVESTIGATION.=
(1) Prove that there is nothing real in the world save the mind
itself.
(2) “Logic is concerned primarily with how we _ought_ to think and
only in a secondary way with how we actually think.” Explain this
quotation.
(3) Prove that there is no such thing as intuitive knowing.
(4) Is there any difference between knowledge and thoughts?
Illustrate.
(5) Show by illustrations that the English language is ambiguous.
(6) Prove by concrete illustration that this is the age of the
survival of the thinker.
(7) Which is the more harmful: falsehood mixed with truth or
unadulterated falsehood? Give reasons.
(8) Give a concrete example of incorrect thinking.
(9) Show that wrong thinking leads to wrong doing.
(10) To be worth while must every subject have a practical value?
(11) “The 20th century virtue is a passion for truth.” Prove the truth
of this.
CHAPTER 2.
THOUGHT AND ITS OPERATION.
=1. THE KNOWING MIND COMPARED WITH THE THINKING MIND.=
In the preceding chapter we were told that the mind may know in two
ways (1) by intuition and (2) by thinking. It is thus implied that
the knowing mind includes the thinking mind plus intuition. Thinking
always involves knowing, but knowing need not involve thinking, and
when some logicians maintain that to know a thing one must think it,
there is danger of being misled. They mean by this that in order to
know anything in a permanent and highly serviceable way one must think
it. All animals know, even such a stupid one as the oyster, and yet one
would hardly give an oyster credit for thinking. Only the higher orders
of animal life think. Some argue that the power is confined exclusively
to the human family. This opinion is debatable. If the claimant means
by thinking, reasoning then his ground is well taken. But if he is
willing to give to thinking a broader content, then he has little
defense for his stand. However, attach as broad a meaning to thinking
as the derivation of the word will permit and even then it is a
narrower term than knowing. Thinking plus intuition equals knowing,
and in intuition there is probably no thinking.
=2. KNOWING BY INTUITION.=
It has been affirmed that intuition is the process involved when the
mind knows _instantly_.[2]
ILLUSTRATIONS:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account