A Class Room Logic: Deductive and Inductive, with Special Application to the Science and Art of TeachingMcNair, George Hastings
Philosophy
A Class Room Logic: Deductive and Inductive, with Special Application to the Science and Art of Teaching
McNair, George Hastings
Logic
The sun rises in the east. The boy throws a stone through the
window. A democratic wave sweeps the country. Prices of food
stuff are high. The bullet, shot out into space, finally falls
to the earth. Each one of these occurrences has a cause.[12]
That universal causation is a fundamental condition of all
induction may be further illustrated. The astronomer notes that
the stars in the vicinity of Vega seem to be moving outward
_from_ a common center; whereas in the opposite part of the sky
the stars seem to be moving inward _toward_ a common center.
Having observed this phenomenon, the astronomer at once looks
for a cause. Finally he decides that the phenomenon is due to
the fact that the sun, with his attending family, is moving
towards Vega. Arranged, the argument may take this form:
The stars in the vicinity of Vega seem to be moving outward
from a common center, whereas in the opposite part of the sky
the stars seem to be moving inward, When descending a mountain
the trees at the foot seem to move outward from, and those at
the top inward toward, a common center, When riding on the train
the ties in front seem to move outward while those in the rear
seem to move inward. From this we conclude that the sun with
the Earth and other planets is moving toward a spot in the sky
near Vega. Were it not for the assumption that the phenomenon
relative to the stars _had a cause_ there could have been no
induction. Moreover, any investigation concerning “democratic
waves,” “prices of food stuffs,” etc., must assume as a starting
point that these phenomena have causes.
It would appear that the mind is not satisfied with a mere
passive observation of the occurrences of the world but is
inclined to reach out for the “whys and wherefores.” Due partly
to this reason, “universal causation” is often referred to as
an _a priori_ law; meaning that it is a law which cannot be
_proved_, but must be _assumed_ in all thinking.
=8. THE LAW OF THE UNIFORMITY OF NATURE.=
Law stated: _The same antecedents are invariably followed by the
same consequents._ “That the course of nature is uniform is the
fundamental principle of induction.”――Mill. “It is not enough to
feel assured that nothing can happen without a cause (causation);
I must also feel assured that the same cause will invariably be
followed by the same effect.”――Fowler.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account