The material of the ballad may be either romantic or historical. The
former class is based on one of the primeval invented situations, one of
the elements of the _Märchen_ in prose. Such tales or myths occur in the
stories of savages, in the legends of peasants, are interwoven later with
the plot in Epic or Romance, and may also inspire ballads. Popular
superstitions, the witch, metamorphosis, the returning ghost, the fairy,
all of them survivals of the earliest thought, naturally play a great
part. The Historical ballad, on the other hand, has a basis of
resounding fact, murder, battle, or fire-raising, but the facts, being
derived from popular rumour, are immediately corrupted and distorted,
sometimes out of all knowledge. Good examples are the ballads on
Darnley’s murder and the youth of James VI.
In the romantic class, we may take _Tamlane_. Here the idea of fairies
stealing children is thoroughly popular; they also steal young men as
lovers, and again, men may win fairy brides, by clinging to them through
all transformations. A classical example is the seizure of Thetis by
Peleus, and Child quotes a modern Cretan example. The dipping in milk
and water, I may add, has precedent in ancient Egypt (in _The Two
Brothers_), and in modern Senegambia. The fairy tax, tithe, or teind,
paid to Hell, is illustrated by old trials for witchcraft, in Scotland.
{0a} Now, in literary forms and romance, as in _Ogier le Danois_,
persons are carried away by the Fairy King or Queen. But here the
literary romance borrows from popular superstition; the ballad has no
need to borrow a familiar fact from literary romance. On the whole
subject the curious may consult “The Secret Commonwealth of Elves, Fauns,
and Fairies,” by the Reverend Robert Kirk of Aberfoyle, himself,
according to tradition, a victim of the fairies.
Thus, in _Tamlane_, the whole _donnée_ is popular. But the current
version, that of Scott, is contaminated, as Scott knew, by incongruous
modernisms. Burns’s version, from tradition, already localizes the
events at Carterhaugh, the junction of Ettrick and Yarrow. But Burns’s
version does not make the Earl of Murray father of the hero, nor the Earl
of March father of the heroine. Roxburgh is the hero’s father in Burns’s
variant, which is more plausible, and the modern verses do not occur.
This ballad apparently owes nothing to literary romance.
In _Mary Hamilton_ we have a notable instance of the Historical Ballad.
No Marie of Mary Stuart’s suffered death for child murder.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account