In the seventeenth century Cervantes gave the world its first great
novel, _Don Quixote_. Cervantes was careless in his work and did not
write short-stories, but tales that are fairly brief. Spain added to
the story a high sense of chivalry and a richness of character that the
Greek romance and the Italian novella did not possess. France followed
this loose composition and lack of beauty in form. Scarron and Le Sage,
the two French fiction writers of this period, contributed little or
nothing to the advancement of story-telling. Cervantes' _The Liberal
Lover_ is as near as this period came to producing a real short-story.
The story-telling of the seventeenth century was largely shaped by the
popularity of the drama. In the eighteenth century the drama gave place
to the essay, and it is to the sketch and essay that we must go to
trace the evolution of the story during this period. Voltaire in France
had a burning message in every essay, and he paid far greater attention
to the development of the thought of his message than to the story he
was telling. Addison and Steele in the _Spectator_ developed some real
characters of the fiction type and told some good stories, but even
their best, like _Theodosius and Constantia_, fall far short of
developing all the dramatic possibilities, and lack the focusing of
interest found in the nineteenth century stories. Some of Lamb's
_Essays of Elia_, especially the _Dream Children_, introduce a delicate
fancy and an essayist's clearness of thought and statement into the
story. At the close of this century German romanticism began to seep
into English thought and prepare the way for things new in literary
thought and treatment.
The nineteenth century opened with a decided preference for fiction.
Washington Irving, reverting to the _Spectator_, produced his sketches,
and, following the trend of his time, looked forward to a new form and
wrote _The Spectre Bridegroom_ and _Rip Van Winkle_. It is only by a
precise definition of short-story that Irving is robbed of the honor of
being the founder of the modern short-story. He loved to meander and to
fit his materials to his story scheme in a leisurely manner. He did not
quite see what Hawthorne instinctively followed and Poe consciously
defined and practiced, and he did not realize that terseness of
statement and totality of impression were the chief qualities he needed
to make him the father of a new literary form. Poe and Maupassant have
reduced the form of the short-story to an exact science; Hawthorne and
Harte have done successfully in the field of romanticism what the
Germans, Tieck and Hoffman, did not do so well; Bjornson and Henry
James have analyzed character psychologically in their short-stories;
Kipling has used the short-story as a vehicle for the conveyance of
specific knowledge; Stevenson has gathered most, if not all, of the
literary possibilities adaptable to short-story use, and has
incorporated them in his _Markheim_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account