A Complete Guide to HeraldryFox-Davies, Arthur Charles
History
A Complete Guide to Heraldry
Fox-Davies, Arthur Charles
Heraldry -- Great Britain
XXIX. BADGES 453
XXX. HERALDIC FLAGS, BANNERS, AND STANDARDS 471
XXXI. MARKS OF CADENCY 477
XXXII. MARKS OF BASTARDY 508
XXXIII. THE MARSHALLING OF ARMS 523
XXXIV. THE ARMORIAL INSIGNIA OF KNIGHTHOOD 561
XXXV. THE ARMORIAL BEARINGS OF A LADY 572
XXXVI. OFFICIAL HERALDIC INSIGNIA 580
XXXVII. AUGMENTATIONS OF HONOUR 589
XXXVIII. ECCLESIASTICAL HERALDRY 600
XXXIX. ARMS OF DOMINION AND SOVEREIGNTY 607
XL. HATCHMENTS 609
XLI. THE UNION JACK 611
XLII. SEIZE-QUARTIERS 618
INDEX 623
{ix}
INTRODUCTION
Too frequently it is the custom to regard the study of the science of
Armory as that of a subject which has passed beyond the limits of practical
politics. Heraldry has been termed "the shorthand of History," but
nevertheless the study of that shorthand has been approached too often as
if it were but the study of a dead language. The result has been that too
much faith has been placed in the works of older writers, whose dicta have
been accepted as both unquestionably correct at the date they wrote, and,
as a consequence, equally binding at the present day.
Since the "Boke of St. Albans" was written, into the heraldic portion of
which the author managed to compress an unconscionable amount of rubbish,
books and treatises on the subject of Armory have issued from the press in
a constant succession. A few of them stand a head and shoulders above the
remainder. The said remainder have already sunk into oblivion. Such a book
as "Guillim" must of necessity rank in the forefront of any armorial
bibliography; but any one seeking to judge the Armory of the present day by
the standards and ethics adopted by that writer, would find himself making
mistake after mistake, and led hopelessly astray. There can be very little
doubt that the "Display of Heraldry" is an accurate representation of the
laws of Armory which governed the use of Arms at the date the book was
written; and it correctly puts forward the opinions which were then
accepted concerning the past history of the science.
There are two points, however, which must be borne in mind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account