A Course of Mechanical, Magnetical, Optical, Hydrostatical and Pneumatical Experiments: perform'd by Francis Hauksbee, and the Explanatory Lectures read by William Whiston, M.A.Whiston, William
Science
A Course of Mechanical, Magnetical, Optical, Hydrostatical and Pneumatical Experiments: perform'd by Francis Hauksbee, and the Explanatory Lectures read by William Whiston, M.A.
Whiston, William
Physical instruments; Physics -- Early works to 1800; Physics -- Experiments
_Fig. 7._ Shews the Effect of the Lens, or double Convex Glass, in
gathering parallel Rays, as G L, H M, A B, I N, K O, _&c._ towards a
Point, as D; because, as in the Case of the Prism above, the Refraction
_to_ the perpendicular in the Entrance, and _from_ it in the Exit of those
Rays, do still, by the different Position of that Perpendicular, conspire
to unite the same Rays.
_Fig. 8._ Shews the contrary Effect of the double Concave Glass, in
scattering the parallel Rays; and that exactly on the like Account; and so
this needs no new Explication.
_Fig. 9._ Shews the Reason why a Lens, or double Convex, shews a near
Object at Q, as more remote at _q_, because it refracts it so that the
Rays from the same Point meet more backward than before: And why it shews
the same Object larger also: Which must needs be, because every Point in
the Object appearing so much more backward, and yet in the same apparent
Angle, its Length and Breadth must every where be proportionably enlarg'd.
_Fig. 10._ Shews how such a Lens inverts Objects, as A, B, _b a_, which it
does on Account of the Intersection of the Rays from each Point, in or
near the Lens it self: Which necessarily infers such an Alteration: just
as the Images of all Objects are in the Eye in an inverted Position, on
the like Account.
_Fig. 11._ Shews how a Lens does so refract the Rays from every Point of
an Object, that is in its Focus C, and B, and A, that the Rays from each
of those Points do become parallel afterward; and also how parallel Rays
of different Positions are gather'd in that Focus.
_Fig. 12._ Is the Nature of direct Vision by the Eye, in some Conformity
to the 10th Figure: only in this Case the Crystalline Humour is the Lens.
_Fig. 13._ Is the Case of a Concavo-convex Glass, with its parallel
Surfaces, as in _Fig. 1_.
[[Plate III. ― Sutton Nicholls sculp:]]
OPTICKS. 9
An Explication of the Third PLATE.
Figure 1. Is a Telescope, with two Convex Glasses, the one towards the
Object and the Segments of a great Sphere, the other near the Eye, the
Segments of a small Sphere _g h i_, and they are to be so placed that the
distinct Base or Image may, by the Collection of the Rays, be in the
common Focus of both the Glasses _f e d_. By these two Glasses the
parallel Rays, or those nearly so, as proceeding from the same Point of
the Object A B C, (which is to be suppos'd considerably remote) are made
to meet in the intermediate Image _f e d_, at _f_, and _e_, and _d_; and
again at the Bottom of the Eye, at _r_, and _s_, and _t_; but in an erect
Position; and therefore so as to shew the Object inverted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account