A Critical Exposition of the Popular 'Jihád': Showing that all the Wars of Mohammad Were Defensive; and; that Aggressive War, or Compulsory Conversion, is not; Allowed in The Koran - 1885Cherágh Ali
Islamic
A Critical Exposition of the Popular 'Jihád': Showing that all the Wars of Mohammad Were Defensive; and; that Aggressive War, or Compulsory Conversion, is not; Allowed in The Koran - 1885
Cherágh Ali
Islam -- Apologetic works; Islam -- Relations; Jihad; War -- Religious aspects -- Islam
Referring to the above attempted assassination Mr. Washington Irving
says: "During this period of his career Mahomet in more than one
instance narrowly escaped falling by the hand of an assassin. He himself
is charged with the use of insidious means to rid himself of an enemy,
for it is said that he sent Amru Ibn Omeya on a secret errand to Mecca,
to assassinate Abu Sofian, but the plot was discovered, and the assassin
only escaped by rapid flight. The charge, however, is not well
substantiated, and is contrary to his general character and
conduct."[230]
Sir W. Muir writes: "There is just a shadow of possibility that the
tradition may have been fabricated by the anti-Omeyad party to throw
odium on the memory of Abu Sofian, as having been deemed by Mahomet
worthy of death. But this is not to be put against the evidence of
unanimous and apparently independent traditions."[231] But, in fact,
there are no unanimous and apparently independent traditions of the
command of Mohammad to assassinate Abu Sofian; there is only one and but
one, by Ibn Sad, which is wholly unreliable, and that too from the lips
of the would-be assassin himself who before the introduction of Islam
was a professional cutthroat, whose narration, therefore, deserves not
our belief.
Even if it be taken for granted that Mohammad did send some one to
assassinate Abu Sofian, who had already sent some one to assassinate
Mohammad as related by Ibn Sad, it was justified in self-defence. It was
a measure for retaliation, not one of mere revenge, but only a means of
protective retribution, which is lawful under the military law.[232]
[Footnote 205: Selections from the Kur-an by Edward William Lane, with
an Introduction by Stanley Lane Poole. Intro., p. xliv: Truebner & Co.,
London, 1879.]
[Footnote 206: Islam under the Arabs, by R.D. Osborn, p. 60, London,
1876.]
[Footnote 207: Wakidi's Campaigns of Mohammad, pp. 172 & 173: Calcutta
Baptist Mission Press; edited by A. Von Kremer.]
[Footnote 208: Sir W. Muir writes that "Hishami says, that Mahomet,
being vexed by Asma's verses, said _publicly_, 'Who will rid me of this
woman?'" But there is no such word in Ibn Hisham which may be rendered
'_publicly_.']
[Footnote 209: Ibn Hisham, p. 994. Wakidi does not give this sentence.
On the contrary, he says, Salim had taken a vow to kill Abu Afak or die
himself.]
[Footnote 210: Ibn Sad Katib Wakidi, pp. 186, 187.]
[Footnote 211: The Life of Mahomet, by Sir W. Muir, Vol. III, pp.
147-148.]
[Footnote 212: In the collections of Bokhari in the Book of Campaigns;
and in the Book of Jihad by Moslim.]
[Footnote 213: Mohammad-bin Sad Katib Wakidi and Mohammad-bin Ishak. The
latter in Ibn Hisham, p. 551.]
[Footnote 214: Vide _Osaba-fi Tamiz Issahaba_; or, Biographical
Dictionary of Persons who knew Mohammad, by Ibn Hajr-al-Askalani. Part
I, No. 1021, p. 434.]
[Footnote 215: Ibn Abbas was only five years old at that time, and was
at Mecca. His evidence is consequently inadmissible.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account