I know my face was full of honest sympathy as I said, gently and
reverently:
"Tell me more of your brother. The thoughts of such men make me better."
She shot a quick, grateful glance, looked down, trembled, shook her
head as she faltered:
"I cannot--please don't; speak of something far removed."
The feeling was so deep, and yet so strongly curbed, that its
repression affected me more deeply than could its manifestation. Her
sorrow became a veiled and sacred mystery of which I could never be
wholly unconscious again; and I felt that however strong and brilliant
she might prove in our subsequent talk, I should ever see, back of all,
the tender-hearted, sensitive woman.
"Please forgive me. I was cruelly thoughtless," I said, in a voice that
trembled slightly. Then, catching up the paper, I continued, with
attempted lightness, "We have found this journal, that we mutually
read, a fruitful theme. What do you think of its literary reviews?"
Mirth and tears struggled for the mastery in her eyes; but she
answered, with a voice that had regained its clear, bell-like tone:
"In some I have seen indisputable proof of impartiality and freedom
from prejudice."
"In what did that proof consist?"
"In the evident fact that the reviewer had not read the book."
"You are severe," I said, coloring slightly.
She looked at me with a little surprise, but continued:
"That does not happen very often. It is clear that there are several
contributors to this department, and I have come to look for the
opinions of one of them with much interest. I am sure of a careful and
appreciative estimate of a book from his point of view. His one fault
appears to be that he sees everything from one perspective, and does
not realize that the same thing may strike other intelligent people
very differently. But he's a fixed and certain quantity, and a good
point to measure from. I like him because he is so sincere. He sits
down to a book as a true scientist does to a phase of nature, to really
learn what there is in it, and not merely to display a little learning,
sarcasm, or smartness. I always feel sure that I know something about a
book after reading one of his reviews, and also whether I could afford
to spend a part of my limited time in reading it."
"I have singled out the same reviewer, and think your estimate correct.
On another occasion, when we have more time, I am going to ask how you
like the musical critic's opinions; for on that subject you would be at
home."
"What makes you think so?"
"Miss Yocomb told me that you taught music in the city, and music is
about the only form of recreation for which I have taken time in my
busy life. There are many things concerning the musical tendencies of
the day that I would like to ask you about. But I hear the clatter of
the supper dishes. What do you think of the editorial page, and its
moral tendencies? That is a good Sunday theme."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account