A Defence of the Inquiry into Mesmerism & Phrenology: chiefly in relation to recent events in Lynn — John Shaqi
A Defence of the Inquiry into Mesmerism & Phrenology: chiefly in relation to recent events in LynnArmes, William
Philosophy
A Defence of the Inquiry into Mesmerism & Phrenology: chiefly in relation to recent events in Lynn
Armes, William
Mesmerism; Phrenology
It is creditable to the Medical Gentlemen of Lynn, that they have, with
few exceptions, applied themselves to the consideration of the subject,
and I have no doubt, would be glad to find in Mesmerism, as in any thing
else, an additional auxiliary in their endeavours to ease the couch of
suffering, and to lessen the amount of human misery. The curative
properties we may leave to the better information of the Faculty, while
we employ our perceptive powers in endeavouring to ascertain the fact, or
fallacy, of the presumed Science.
_That the discovery may be abused_ is at once admitted, though by no
means, to the extent of the fears of some individuals; but, we do well to
inquire how the same idea applies to other matters. I incline to the
belief that there are few powers in Nature not capable of being abused.
Who is not aware of the destructive properties of Fire, and how often it
is employed, by the Incendiary, to the damage of the honest and
unsuspecting? Who has not heard, day after day, of Juries sitting upon
the bodies of unfortunate persons who have been destroyed by this
powerful element of Nature? and yet, who ever heard of any sane person
who would argue, that it had been better for Mankind had Fire not been
known?
Who does not know the mighty power for ill, as well as for good, the
_Materia Medica_ confers upon the professional part of civilized Society?
yet, who would argue, that it would be better for mankind to discontinue
the use and practice of Medicine?
The exhibitions of Mesmerism have been compared to the feats of the
Jugglers of India, and, we have been pressed with the assurance, _that
the Mesmeriser is quite outdone by the Juggler_. It may be so, but I
submit, that there is a clear line of distinction to be drawn between the
two cases.
The Indian comes before you professing to deceive, he defies you indeed
to discern the process of imposture, and sometimes the observer is so
astonished that he falls back on the only idea that can serve him at the
moment, (so completely are his senses paralyzed) that, there must be some
superhuman agency employed; but, after all, it only professes to be the
feat of a Conjuror, and he offers you no clue to the practice of the same
delusion.
The Mesmeriser exhibits, before your eyes, phenomena very strange and
startling, but he says “I am no Conjuror; I only profess to show you a
latent power in Nature, as yet but imperfectly developed; I believe that
its knowledge may be useful to Society; I profess to do nothing which you
cannot do yourselves; test my experiments in every possible way, _I will
assist you to do so_.”
Who, I ask, does not at once see, that in the one case, we are imposed
upon by a clever Impostor, and cannot help ourselves; while in the other,
we can test almost every experiment by trials of our own, and need draw
no conclusion but from the result of our own individual and absolute
experiment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account