A Defence of the Inquiry into Mesmerism & Phrenology: chiefly in relation to recent events in LynnArmes, William
Philosophy
A Defence of the Inquiry into Mesmerism & Phrenology: chiefly in relation to recent events in Lynn
Armes, William
Mesmerism; Phrenology
Mine is a far different object, I desire to shew the unlettered Christian
that he has not believed in a “cunningly devised fable,” but, that his
Faith rests upon a sure basis, and that he may take his Bible in his hand
and laugh to scorn the insidious attempts of the learned infidelity and
skepticism of the world. {19}
I believe much harm is done to Religion by the well intentioned but idle
fears of Christians, upon the introduction of any new Science; their
Faith and not their Fears should be called into exercise. I believe the
Bible to be given by the Author of Nature, and that he never gave any
information to his Creatures which could ever be adverse or inconsistent
to any subsequent development that Nature could afford.
I dare not admit the idea that the testimony of Scripture depends for its
acceptance upon the sufferance of Modern Science. I take vastly higher
ground, and believe that the Christian man may approach with confidence
to the investigation of any phenomena in Nature, in the assurance that,
so far as it is true, it will not be found inconsonant with what he
rightly considers to be the Word of God.
Much of the difficulty in the minds of well meaning Christians, in all
ages, in relation to discoveries in Nature has doubtless arisen from the
peculiar and poetical language in which the Scriptural Record is
expressed. In the fact that it was just so expressed as to be understood
by the particular people to whom it was originally given. That it does
not profess to be a guide to man, in his researches through the arcanum
of Nature; but, incidentally alludes to natural phenomena only so far as
the people of that age were acquainted with such subjects, and in order
only, to give a proper impression as to the greatness and goodness of
God.
Had these propositions been more generally observed, I venture to
suggest, that Religion and Science would not have been found so often in
circumstances of apparent collision.
The best men have, in all ages, been too much disposed to put their Faith
in abeyance, while their Fears have been allowed to proclaim a danger to
Religion; and, alas! too often to persecute those who have made the most
useful and important discoveries.
It is well known that the Copernican System was declared by the Pope, on
its introduction, in a bull, specially issued for the purpose, to be
“false in fact and heretical in religion,” and its author was doomed to
imprisonment for his discovery! and we find that while Plato, Cicero,
Aristotle, Strabo, and other heathen authors allowed the rotundity of the
earth, that Lactantius, _one of the Christian Fathers_, influenced by the
well meaning, but ill employed fear I have described, contended for the
old opinion. He asks, “Is any one so foolish, as to believe that there
are men whose feet are higher than their heads; trees growing downwards;
rain, snow, and hail, falling upwards?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account