A CADGER’S MAP OF A BEGGING DISTRICT. EXPLANATION OF THE HIEROGLYPHICS. ☓ NO GOOD; too poor, and know too much. ◠+ STOP,—if you have what they want, they will buy. They are pretty “_fly_” (knowing). ⸧— GO IN THIS DIRECTION, it is better than the other road. Nothing that way. ◇ _BONE_ (good). Safe for a “cold tatur,” if for nothing else. “_Cheese your patter_” (don’t talk much) here. ▽ _COOPER’D_ (spoilt), by too many tramps calling there. □ _GAMMY_ (unfavourable), likely to have you taken up. Mind the dog. ☉ _FLUMMUXED_ (dangerous), sure of a month in “_quod_” (prison). ⊕ _RELIGIOUS_, but tidy on the whole. _See page 37._ A DICTIONARY OF MODERN SLANG, CANT, AND VULGAR WORDS, USED AT THE PRESENT DAY IN THE STREETS OF LONDON; THE UNIVERSITIES OF OXFORD AND CAMBRIDGE; THE HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT; THE DENS OF ST. GILES; AND THE PALACES OF ST. JAMES. PRECEDED BY A HISTORY OF CANT AND VULGAR LANGUAGE; WITH GLOSSARIES OF TWO SECRET LANGUAGES, SPOKEN BY THE WANDERING TRIBES OF LONDON, THE COSTERMONGERS, AND THE PATTERERS. By A LONDON ANTIQUARY. “Rabble-charming words, which carry so much wild-fire wrapt up in them.”—SOUTH. SECOND EDITION, REVISED, WITH TWO THOUSAND ADDITIONAL WORDS. LONDON: JOHN CAMDEN HOTTEN, PICCADILLY. 1860. LONDON: PRINTED BY TAYLOR AND GREENING, GRAYSTOKE-PLACE, FETTER-LANE, E.C. PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. The First Edition of this work had a rapid sale, and within a few weeks after it was published the entire issue passed from the publisher’s shelves into the hands of the public. A Second Edition, although urgently called for, was not immediately attempted. The First had been found incomplete and faulty in many respects, and the author determined to thoroughly revise and recast before again going to press. The present edition, therefore, will be found much more complete than the First; indeed, I may say that it has been entirely rewritten, and that, whereas the First contained but 3,000 words, this gives nearly 5,000, with a mass of fresh illustrations, and extended articles on the more important slang terms—HUMBUG, for instance. The notices of a _Lingua Franca_ element in the language of London vagabonds is peculiar to this edition. My best thanks are due to several correspondents for valuable hints and suggestions as to the probable etymologies of various colloquial expressions. One literary journal of high repute recommended a division of cant from slang; but the annoyance of two indices in a small work appeared to me to more than counterbalance the benefit of a stricter philological classification, so I have for the present adhered to the old arrangement; indeed, to separate cant from slang would be almost impossible. Respecting the HIEROGLYPHICS OF VAGABONDS, I have been unable to obtain further information; but the following extract from a popular manual which I have just met with is worth recording, although, perhaps, somewhat out of place in a Preface.