He has a bantering Argument [115] to shew, that, "If in future Ages Mr. _Marshal_'s Book should escape the just Judgment it deserves, of being condemn'd to the _Pastry-Cooks_ and _Grocers_, an industrious Chronologist might make an Observation to prove him too young to write it." The _Parallel_ is in _Pag._ 126, which being very gross _Raillery_, I only refer you to it. This Mr. _Earbery_ also wrote a _Letter to Bishop_ Fleetwood, under the Title of "A Letter to the Bishop of _Ely_, upon the Occasion of his _suppos'd_ late _Charge_, said to be deliver'd at _Cambridge August_ 7, 1716, _&c._" in which he pursues the Ironical Scheme laid down in the said Title, and endeavours to _vindicate_ his _Lordship from the Aspersion of writing such a mean Pamphlet_, as the _Charge_. Nor do these _Jacobites_ confine their Drollery to their Adversaries without, but exercise it on one another, as may be seen in their late Dispute about King _Edward the Sixth_'s Liturgy. And Mr. _Lesley_ himself, happening to engage on the side opposite to the Traditions of the Fathers, and attacking those Traditions by Low-Church Notions and Arguments, and thereby running counter to all his former Books, is attack'd just in the same manner he attack'd Bishop _Burnet_, in a Book under this Title, "Mr. _Lesley_'s Defence, from some erroneous and dangerous Principles, advanced in a Letter said to have been written concerning the New Separation." And it has several Paragraphs at the beginning in the very words of one of Mr. _Lesley_'s Books against the said Bishop, as may be seen on Comparison. XVI. _Christ-Church_ in _Oxford_ is no less famous for the _Drolling_, than for the _Orthodox_ Spirit reigning there; and the former, being judged an excellent Method to support the latter, is cultivated among the Youth, and employ'd by the Members of that Society against all the supposed Adversaries of the Church, and encourag'd by the governing Ecclesiasticks there and elsewhere. Among the many, who have receiv'd their Education there, and been form'd in Drollery, I will only instance in the Reverend Dr. _Atterbury_ and Dr. _South_; who being as famous for _Drollery_ as for Zeal for Religion, and applauded for their _Wit_ no less than for their _Orthodoxy_; and particularly for imploying the former in behalf of the latter, seem of sufficient Weight to bear down all Attempts to stifle their Productions. What Considerations can make us amends for the Loss of such excellent _drolling Writings_, which promote Religion as well as Mirth?