A discourse on the theory of gunnery: Delivered at the anniversary meeting of the Royal Society, November 30, 1778 — John Shaqi
A discourse on the theory of gunnery: Delivered at the anniversary meeting of the Royal Society, November 30, 1778Pringle, John, Sir
History
A discourse on the theory of gunnery: Delivered at the anniversary meeting of the Royal Society, November 30, 1778
Pringle, John, Sir
Ballistics
You have heard, Sir, the account I have given of the rise and progress
of the _theory of gunnery_, and of your improvement of it; a recital,
which by no means would have done either you or the subject justice, had
it been addressed to any other audience than to the present. But as my
intention was only briefly to recall to the memory of these gentlemen
what they knew of this subject, antecedently to your Paper, and to remind
them of the result of your experiments, I flatter myself I have said
what was sufficient on the occasion; being now authorized by them to
deliver into your hand this medal, as the perpetual memorial of their
approbation. And let me add, Sir, that they make you this present with
the more cordial affection, as by your other ingenious and valuable
communications they are assured, not only of your talents, but of your
zeal, for promoting the interests and honour of their Institution.
[Illustration]
FOOTNOTES
[1] 2 Chron. xxvi. 15.
[2] M. FOLARD.
[3] The chief exception that occurs to this general remark, is the rapid
progress which in that age COPERNICUS made in astronomy; who was not
indeed an Italian, but was supposed to have profited by his early travels
into Italy, which he enlightened afterwards by his admirable discoveries.
[4] See MONTUCLA, Hist. des Mathem. vol. I. p. 623.
[5] Those were _La Nuova Scientia_, and _Quesiti ed Inventioni diverse_.
[6] Published at London, A. 1588.
[7] He was born in the year 1564; but few if any of his works were
published till after the year 1600, and his dialogues on motion not
before 1638.
[8] See his 4th Dialogue on Motion.
[9] See Hist. de l’Academ. Roy. des Sciences, A. 1707.
[10] In the year 1683, see Hist. de l’Acad. R. des Sci. A. 1707.
[11] Hist. de l’Acad. R. des Sc. A. 1707, under the article _Mechanique_.
[12] Viz. in 1674.
[13] See his treatise _To hit a Mark_, published in 1690.
[14] Philos. Trans. No. 179, p. 20.
[15] In the year 1687.
[16] NEWTON, Princip. Mathem. lib. ii. sect. 7.
[17] Eloge de NEWTON.
[18] Discours de la Cause de la Pesanteur. Leide, 1690.
[19] Mem. de l’Acad. R. des Sc. A. 1716.
[20] DAN. BERNOULLI, Comment. Acad. Petropol. T. 2. & 3.
[21] It is also much to the honour of Mr. ROBINS, that his writings on
this subject have been translated into foreign languages by men that were
the best judges of their merit. I need only name MM. EULER, and LE ROY.
ERRATA.
Page 4. l. 5. _for_ this _read_ the
16. 9. _for_ combate _read_ combat
20. 17. _for_ tract _read_ track
26. last line of the note, _for_ M. M. _read_ MM.
Transcriber’s Note: The errata have been corrected.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account