A discourse on the theory of gunnery: Delivered at the anniversary meeting of the Royal Society, November 30, 1778Pringle, John, Sir
History
A discourse on the theory of gunnery: Delivered at the anniversary meeting of the Royal Society, November 30, 1778
Pringle, John, Sir
Ballistics
It seems but just to trace and commemorate the inventors of the ingenious
arts which furnish matter for discourses on these occasions; and not
only the main inventors, but even those who first turned their thoughts
upon the subject: for, though such men may not have produced any thing
perfect, yet they may have suggested ideas to others of a less inventive,
but of a more executive genius, and who, unprovided with those hints,
would never have made any notable discovery. I must therefore observe,
that the _Italians_ were the first who emerged out of those thick clouds
of ignorance and barbarism which had so long overspread this quarter of
the world. They profited by the unhappy fate of Constantinople; for by
liberally receiving the learned emigrants on that distressful occasion,
they were largely repaid by their arts and sciences, and still more
abundantly by their language, whereby they were enabled to read and to
translate those ancient manuscripts, which the Greeks had saved out of
the wreck of their country. The art of printing, which was established
soon after, was the means of quickly disseminating those treasures of
knowledge, and concurred with the fall of the eastern empire to form an
epoch for the advancement of learning, unparalleled in the annals of
letters.
The end of the 15th century, and the whole of the 16th, were chiefly
employed by the Italians in the study and in the translation of the
old Greek authors. The geometry of the ancient Greeks, as well as the
arithmetic in numbers and species of the Arabians, were cultivated;
but both remained, as it were, sciences by themselves, unassisting to,
or at best but weak and reluctant auxiliaries to the philosophy of the
schools: and indeed how could the abstracted doctrines of numbers and
quantities be strained to co-operate with a system, in which neither
the laws of motion, nor any but the superficial, and often delusive
properties of matter, were to be met with? The genius of the Greeks, all
acute and brilliant as it was, had never been properly directed to the
interpretation of nature, and was indeed unfit (as Lord Bacon pronounced)
for a study that made so slow and painful a progress, by re-iterated and
varied experiments and observations. It was no wonder then, if the _mixed
mathematics_, as they are called, descended to the moderns in a state
no-wise corresponding to the elegance and certainty of those parts of the
science which were elementary and pure; and that those mixed parts should
have been found defective and erroneous, in proportion (if I may so
express myself) to the physical considerations that were to be taken into
the inquiry. The imperfection of the ancients, with regard to natural
philosophy, was not perceived at that time; nay, at the period we are
treating of, the learned were firmly persuaded of the contrary, and that
all that was wanting to be known concerning the laws of nature, and the
properties of matter, was to be taken either directly, or by deduction,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account