A dissertation on the true age of the world : $b in which is determined the chronology of the period from creation to the Christian eraWallace, R. (Robert)
Religion
A dissertation on the true age of the world : $b in which is determined the chronology of the period from creation to the Christian era
Wallace, R. (Robert)
Bible; Chronology; Chronology, Historical
depend on these statements, it is unnecessary to make them the subject
of discussion.
It is a very remarkable thing that Josephus differs here from the
Septuagint only in the _Antepaidogonian age_ of Lamech, and that in this
point he agrees with the Hebrew text. Nor are we aware of the existence
of any various reading which would lead us to suppose that it had been
otherwise in the text of Josephus. This circumstance alone, though there
be many others, would almost lead us to conclude, with Mr. Cuninghame,
Preface to his “Synopsis,” p. vii., “that the corruption of the
Chronology must have taken place at an earlier period” than is commonly
supposed by the learned. He believes “it to have been in the interval
between our Lord’s death and the beginning of the Jewish war. This
allows more than 30 years for the purpose, which is quite sufficient.”
He also conceives “that it must have been well known to Josephus, and
the _end for which it was done_;” and he adds, “It was, however, yet of
too recent an origin for him to venture upon the bold experiment of
openly substituting it [the corrupted chronology] for the universal
chronology of his own, as well as other nations, and the Christian
church, and therefore he has introduced both schemes, namely, the _short
and the long_ [_computation_], in such a manner as to perplex and
utterly confuse the whole subject, and to draw from some of our most
learned men, the acknowledgment that his chronology is involved in
hopeless obscurity.” The following explanation of the discrepancy
between Josephus and the Septuagint in regard to the _Antepaidogonian
age_ of Lamech will be to the general reader more satisfactory than that
to which we referred in our _first Part_, p. 23. “Josephus, who in all
the other Antediluvian generations follows the Greek, does in this of
Lamech follow the Hebrew, and the effect of it is, that his Diluvian
period from Creation is 2256, while that of the best copies of the
Seventy, and of Demetrius, is 2262 years. This difference of 6 years,
therefore, goes through his whole Chronology. At the beginning of the
1st book of his Antiquities [_that is in the Title to the Book_] he
tells us, that it contains a period of 3833 years, to which, adding the
6 years above mentioned to make it accord with the Greek chronology of
Demetrius, the sum is 3839 years. If the reader will next turn to the
Table in the Fulness of the Times, p. 34, he will see that this period
of 3839 years, measures exactly the interval, from Creation, to the end
of the year B.C. 1640, when the children of Israel left Egypt. Now as it
is in the nature of things impossible that this most remarkable
coincidence should have been unknown to Josephus, the necessary and the
legitimate conclusion is, that the above period of 3833 years is his
authentic chronology from Creation to the Exodus. It divides itself as
follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account