A dissertation on the true age of the world : $b in which is determined the chronology of the period from creation to the Christian eraWallace, R. (Robert)
Religion
A dissertation on the true age of the world : $b in which is determined the chronology of the period from creation to the Christian era
Wallace, R. (Robert)
Bible; Chronology; Chronology, Historical
1. State of the World at the Birth of Christ—Tradition
concerning his Advent—Its epoch determined from Prophecy page 1
2. Short history of the Septuagint Version of the Old
Testament—Discrepancies between the Hebrew and the
Septuagint—Their effect on Sacred Chronology 4
SECTION I.—AGES AND EPOCHS OF THE WORLD.
CHAPTER I.—EXTENT OF THE FIRST AGE OF THE WORLD.
1. Discrepancies of the Hebrew, Septuagint, and Samaritan
Texts—Solution of the difficulty by the chronographers of
the middle ages—Consistency of the Septuagint and the New
Testament—Numerical errors of the Hebrew text 9
2. Origin and effect of various readings—The immaculate purity
and miraculous preservation of the Hebrew text, a
figment—Consistency of the word of God 12
3. Tables of the Discrepancies of the three texts with regard
to the Antediluvian Patriarchs: Table I., In their
Antepaidogonian ages—Table II., In their Postpaidogonian
ages—Table III., In their whole lives—Internal evidence
afforded by the Tables in favour of the computation of the
Septuagint—The Discrepancies of the Hebrew and Samaritan the
work of design—Proof of this fact from the Scriptures 14
4. Reasons assigned for the alterations in the Hebrew and
Samaritan—Accuracy of the Septuagint demonstrated—An
objection to its chronology removed—Utility of the
publication of _fac simile_ editions of the codices—Late
origin of the _printed_ Hebrew text—Its original agreement
with the Septuagint proved 20
CHAPTER II.—EXTENT OF THE SECOND AGE OF THE WORLD.
1. Discrepancies of the three texts—Unfounded hypothesis of
Usher—Agreement of Josephus with the Septuagint—Authority of
this Version in the Church—Its chronology confirmed by the
most authentic Chinese annals—Reasons why the Jews altered
the Hebrew text 28
2. Tables of the Discrepancies of the three texts with regard
to the Postdiluvian Patriarchs: Table IV. In their
Antepaidogonian ages—Table V. In their Postpaidogonian
ages—Table VI. In their whole lives 31
3. Authenticity of the _Second Cainan_—Dilemma of the
Venerable Bede—Mistake of Mr. Clinton and Mr. Horne—Usher’s
Dissertation—Inconsistency of authorized translations of the
Bible—Rashness of Beza—The Second Cainan in the most ancient
Codices—Mistake of Bede, Hales, and other chronographers 34
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account