Most teachers set themselves on a pedestal. They think that they lose
dignity if they are not able to answer every question that a child puts
to them. One result is that the child develops a dangerous inferiority
complex. I knew one boy who was a duffer at mathematics. His weakness
was due to the inferiority he felt when he saw the learned mathematical
master juggle with figures as easily as a conjurer juggles with billiard
balls. The little chap lost all hope, and when he worked problems he
worked solely to escape punishment.
The difficulty is that if a teacher works at a subject year after year he
is bound to become an expert. The only remedy I can think of is to make
each teacher take up a new subject at the beginning of every school year.
By the time that he had been master of Mathematics, History, Drawing,
English, French, German, Latin, Geography, Chemistry, Physics,
Psychology, Physiology, Eurhythmics, Music, Woodwork, it would be time to
retire . . . with a pension or a psychosis. The late Sir William Osier
said that a man was too old at forty; my experience leads me to conclude
that many a teacher is too old at twenty.
I sometimes think that every man has a certain definite psychic age fixed
for him by the Almighty before he is born. I know a man of seventy who
is psychically five years old, and he will never grow older. I know a
boy of ten who is psychically sixty years old, and he will never grow
younger.
Psycho-analysis is doing a lot of good, but I fear that it may do a lot
of harm, for, one fine day Professor Freud or Dr. Jung will get hold of
Peter Pan, take him by the back of the neck, and say: "My lad, you've got
a fixation somewhere; you are the super-regression-to-the-infantile
specimen; you've got to be analysed." And then Peter will grow up and
read _The Daily News_ and own an allotment and a season ticket.
When we know all about psychology, the world will be rather dull. The
Freudians have said that the play of _Hamlet_ is the result of
Shakespeare's Oedipus Complex. If Shakespeare had not had an unconscious
hatred of his father, _Hamlet_ would never have been written. In other
words, if Bacon had discovered the psychology of the unconscious,
Shakespeare might have been analysed and forthwith might have gone in for
keeping bees instead of writing plays.
It is the neurotic who leads the world; he is a rebel and he is an
idealist. Yet when you analyse him you find what a poor devil he is.
His noble crusade against vivisection is due to the abnormal strain of
cruelty he is repressing in himself; his passion for Socialism comes from
his infant fear of and rebellion against his father. The ardent
suffragette who smashes windows in a just cause is merely doing so
because the vote is a symbol of freedom from an arrogant husband.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account