A Few Words on the Crystal Palace QuestionVaughan, C. J. (Charles John)
Religion
A Few Words on the Crystal Palace Question
Vaughan, C. J. (Charles John)
Crystal Palace (Sydenham, London, England); Sunday legislation -- Great Britain
Transcribed from the 1852 John Murray edition by David Price
A FEW WORDS
ON
THE CRYSTAL PALACE QUESTION.
* * * * *
BY
CHARLES JOHN VAUGHAN, D.D.
HEAD MASTER OF HARROW SCHOOL.
* * * * *
LONDON:
JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET;
CROSSLEY AND CLARKE, LEICESTER AND HARROW:
MACMILLAN AND CO., CAMBRIDGE.
MDCCCLII.
* * * * *
PRINTED BY W. NICOL, 60, PALL MALL.
* * * * *
A FEW WORDS
ON
THE CRYSTAL PALACE QUESTION.
No Clergyman who values his own ease will write on either side of a
question connected however remotely with that of Sunday observance. If
he takes the one side, the world accuses him of bigotry: if the other,
his brethren stigmatize him as a Latitudinarian. What is worse, he runs
the risk of either furnishing a handle to the irreligious, or perplexing
and depressing the thoughtful and serious.
Nor is the danger removed by his occupying a position of the utmost
possible moderation, acknowledging the strength of both sides, and
endeavouring to adjust with all evenness their conflicting claims. The
only result is, that he becomes the prey of both parties: each holds on
its way, and the voice of candour is silenced by the uproar.
Yet the truth must be spoken. No personal considerations ought to
suppress it. No anxiety for the cause of good can justify a timid
compromise with error.
It is impossible to reflect without a sense of deep disquiet upon the
present position of the Sunday question in England. It is a point on
which men’s professions are at war with their conduct. It is a point on
which traditional ideas are held in forced conjunction with altered
practices. It is a point on which Christian teachers will not speak out.
It is a point on which popular prepossessions are accepted as a
convenient fact, even where they are felt to rest on insufficient
grounds, and to lead to a most inadequate result.
And what is the consequence? Men’s consciences are perplexed. They
ask—and there is no audible answer—Why do I observe the Sunday? Is it on
the ground of the Mosaic commandment? If so, who has relaxed the
strictness of its terms? Where is the permission to do, what we all do,
but what Israel did not, on the Sabbath day? Who taught us that in this
one instance the Christian rule of keeping the spirit of God’s
commandments implies the licence to break the letter?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account