A Field Study of the Kansas Ant-Eating Frog, Gastrophryne olivaceaFitch, Henry S. (Henry Sheldon)
Science
A Field Study of the Kansas Ant-Eating Frog, Gastrophryne olivacea
Fitch, Henry S. (Henry Sheldon)
Frogs
Date Precipitation No. of
in inches caught frogs
July 1 2.02 8
July 10 .11 none
July 16 1.26 none
July 20-21 .94 3
July 24 .38 2
July 28 .29 none
August 1-2 3.22 31
August 6-7-8 2.43 none
August 12 .28 none
August 16 .29 none
August 19-22 .70 none
August 27-28 1.05 none
September 9 .50 none
September 29-30 .38 none
October 4 .74 none
October 12-14 3.51 none
From the positions of the traps and drift fences, it was obvious that
all of the frogs that were caught were travelling toward the pond.
Capture of an equal number moving away from the pond a few days
afterward might have been expected but none at all was caught while
making a return trip. Therefore it seems that the frogs returned by a
different route to their home ranges after breeding. Of necessity they
make the return trip under conditions drier than those that prevail on
the pondward trip, which is usually made in a downpour. Probably the
return travel is slower, more leisurely, and with more tendency to keep
to sheltered situations.
The call is a bleat, resembling that of a sheep, but higher, of lesser
volume, and is not unlike the loud rattling buzz of an angry bee. The
call is usually of three to four seconds duration, with an interval
several times as long. Calling males were floating, almost upright, in
the water within a few yards of shore, where there was dense vegetation.
The throat pouch when fully expanded is several times as large as the
entire head. When a person approached to within a few yards of frogs
they usually stopped calling, submerged, and swam to a place of
concealment.
Having heard the call of typical _G. carolinensis_ in Louisiana, I have
the impression that it is a little shorter, more sheeplike, and less
insectlike than that of _G. olivacea_. The call of _Gastrophryne_ is of
such peculiar quality that it is difficult to describe. Different
observers have described it in different terms. Stebbins (1951: 391) has
described the call in greatest detail, and also has quoted from the
descriptions of it previously published. These descriptions include the
following: "high, shrill buzz"; "buzz, harsh and metallic"; "like an
electric buzzer"; "like bees at close range but more like sheep at a
distance"; "bleating baa"; "shrill, long-drawn quaw quaw"; "whistled
wh[=e][=e] followed by a bleat."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account