A first book in organic evolutionShute, D. Kerfoot (Daniel Kerfoot)
Science
A first book in organic evolution
Shute, D. Kerfoot (Daniel Kerfoot)
Evolution
All heritages, then, are derived directly through the germ cells.
Can there be any heritages indirectly from the somatic cells through
the germ-cells, as has hitherto been assumed? In other words, can
acquired characteristics be transmitted to the offspring? This question
has given origin to the battle royal that is still going on between
opposing schools of biology. The contending parties have appealed to
such biological evidence as is furnished by a study of use-inheritance,
reflex and instinctive actions in animals, etc., and to such experimental
evidence as the induction of traumatic epilepsy in guinea pigs, a change
in the shape of the ear by cutting the cervical sympathetic nerve,
protrusion of the eyeball through injury to the restiform body of the
brain, and such like, noting the effects on the offspring, and have drawn
very different conclusions.
As to the transmission or non-transmission of acquired characters, some
have maintained that only germinal variations are transmitted (because
they believe the germ cells are _insulated_ from the body cells, and
therefore from somatic influences). For instance, Ziegler, in his work
on _General Pathology_, says: “If a disease, such as nearsightedness,
is the product of a special inherited predisposition, _plus_ the effect
of harmful influences which have acted upon the body during life, only
that part can be transmitted which was received by inheritance, but not
that part which was derived from external influences.” In other words,
there is no transmission of acquired character. In this belief it will be
observed that he follows Weismann.
On the contrary, other investigators, like Darwin and Spencer, teach
that somatic variations—the plus element in Ziegler’s illustration of
nearsightedness—do influence the germ-cells (through some such agency as
Darwin’s theory of pangenesis suggests), and that, therefore, acquired
characters can be transmitted. The question is one of fundamental
importance, and yet no crucial experiment has been devised or fact
observed which can compel the correct answer. The evidence seems to favor
the view that acquired characters can be transmitted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account