A friend of Marie-Antoinette (Lady Atkyns)Barbey, Frédéric
History
A friend of Marie-Antoinette (Lady Atkyns)
Barbey, Frédéric
Atkyns, Charlotte Walpole, Lady, approximately 1758-1836; France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799; Louis XVII, of France, 1785-1795
“Now supervenes a whole year, during which his doings and his
whereabouts are most carefully concealed,” wrote another; “however,
I am certain that he is acting and working pertinaciously against
the interests of France. I have heard him make this remark: ‘_We
shall take some time doing it, but at last we shall conquer you_.’” A
third added: “His tranquillity and his silence are but masks for his
activity, and I, for one, could never be persuaded that he has all of
a sudden ceased to correspond with _Lord Grenville_ in London, with
the _Count de Romanzof_, with a certain _Nicolai_ in St. Petersburg,
with _Prince Belmonte_, with the _Chevalier de Saint-Andre_, with
_Roger de Damas_ in Italy, with _Dumoustier_, who is, I believe, a
Hohenlohe Prince in Berlin, and directly with the Count de Lille.”
Finally, d’Auerweck, according to the same report, “complaisantly
displayed a spot in the shape of the fleur-de-lys, inside his
fist, declaring that ‘this is a sign of descent; it is a mark of
predestination; I of all men am bound to devote myself and assist in
the return of the Bourbons!’”
It would be a fatal mistake to believe that these fairy tales, all
vague and absurd as they often were, remained lost and forgotten in
the despatch-boxes of the Ministry of Police. The region, near as
it was to Rastadt, where d’Auerweck was reported to have made his
appearance, was a valuable and important indication, which of itself
was sufficient to make the man an object for watchful suspicion. The
ominous nature of the times must, of course, be remembered. Fouché, who
had just been restored to favour, and had been placed for the second
time at the head of the Ministry of Police, was anxious to prove his
zeal afresh, to please the Emperor and to deserve his confidence, while
his mind was still troubled by the execution of the Duc d’Enghien, by
the exploits of Georges Cadoudal, and by the discovery of the English
Agency at Bordeaux, which were all fitting reasons for attracting
the Minister’s attention and for exciting his curiosity. So, when on
October 11, 1804, his Excellency decided to make further searching
investigations into d’Auerweck’s case, and gave precise orders to the
prefects of the frontier departments of the Grand Duchy, it is doubtful
whether he was careful to note in his charge the principal reasons for
attaching suspicion upon the Baron, viz. those which had to do with the
assassination of the plenipotentiaries at Rastadt.
It was some time before the required information could be obtained,
and though the first inquiries about d’Auerweck made by Desportes,
the prefect of the Upper Rhine, added little in the way of news, they
agreed, nevertheless, in certifying that the Baron lived very quietly
in the outskirts of Offenburg--
“that he there devoted himself entirely to his agricultural
occupations, and that the kind of life he led did not foster any
suspicion that he kept up his old campaigns of intrigue.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account