A friend of Marie-Antoinette (Lady Atkyns)Barbey, Frédéric
History
A friend of Marie-Antoinette (Lady Atkyns)
Barbey, Frédéric
Atkyns, Charlotte Walpole, Lady, approximately 1758-1836; France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799; Louis XVII, of France, 1785-1795
Six months later, Desportes, in returning to the subject, showed
himself more positive than ever, for he affirmed--
“that no active correspondence can be traced to d’Auerweck, and that
he saw scarcely any one. He is a man of a caustic and critical turn
of mind, who often lets himself go in conversation without reflection
in his anxiety to talk brilliantly. A point which is particularly
reassuring about him is that he is without credit, without fortune,
and of no personal account, and that if he wanted to mix himself up
afresh in intrigues he would choose some other place than Offenburg,
where there are now only three _émigrés_, the youngest of whom is
seventy-seven years of age.”
But, in spite of these very positive statements, the Minister preserved
his attitude of mistrust, which was strengthened by the arrival of
fresh notes, in which the same denunciations of the “little Baron” were
repeated. He was described as being “restless by inclination, violently
fanatical in all his opinions, and longing to make himself notorious
by some startling act.” But his position was made worse by the
information which was received, that in the autumn of 1805 d’Auerweck
had absented himself from home for several days, frightened, no doubt,
by the proximity of the French armies, which were dotted about on the
banks of the Rhine. How could this sudden flight be accounted for? And
his alarm at the sight of the Emperor’s soldiers at close quarters?
Such conduct struck Fouché as being very suspicious. He ordered a
supplementary inquiry, and this time he did not content himself with
the information afforded by the prefect of the Upper Rhine, but let
loose one of his best bloodhounds on his scent. At the time, two years
ago, when preparations were being made for the kidnapping of the Duc
d’Enghien and for watching his residence at Ettenheim, recourse was
had to the services of the Commissary of Police, Popp by name, who was
stationed at Strasburg. In this frontier town near Basle an active and
intelligent man was needed, who could maintain a constant watch on the
underhand practices of the Royalist agents. Commissary Popp seemed to
be made for the job. His handling of the Duc d’Enghien’s affairs earned
the approval of Napoleon; and Fouché, since his reinstatement in the
Ministry, recognized in him a clever and expert functionary, on whom
he could always count.
This was the man who was charged with the task of spying on d’Auerweck,
and throughout the whole of 1806 Popp was hard at work on this mission.
His original authentications differed very little from what Desportes
had written, and there was nothing to prove that the Baron had in any
way departed from his passive attitude.
“I have not discovered,” wrote Popp on April 22, 1806, “that he is
in correspondence with the English agitation, or that he shows any
inclination to excite and embitter people’s tempers. I believe that
he, like many others, is more to be pitied than to be feared.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account