A Guide to Methods and Observation in History: Studies in High School Observation — John Shaqi
A Guide to Methods and Observation in History: Studies in High School ObservationDavis, Calvin Olin
History
A Guide to Methods and Observation in History: Studies in High School Observation
Davis, Calvin Olin
History -- Study and teaching
28. Does the teacher emphasize this element of history sufficiently?
29. How, in detail, can such influences be revealed to high school
students so that their real significance can be recognized?
30. Is the significance of national or race spirit in producing history
sufficiently emphasized by the teacher?
31. Can you give an illustration of its notable operation?
32. Has the influence of religious emotions and aspirations been shown
by the teacher in its full significance?
33. Can you give an illustration of the complete modification of
history because of "sentimental interests"?
34. Are such modifications somewhat common and important?
35. Does the teacher impress this fact upon his pupils?
36. Does the teacher make clear the significance of the _Zeitgeist_, or
spirit of the age, in shaping history?
37. How much attention is given to the study of notable characters in
history?
38. Ought biography to occupy a more important place in the high school
course in history?
39. How is such study secured in the school you have observed,--through
collateral readings by the class, individual reports, or incidental
classroom discussions?
40. Does the teacher sufficiently stress the fact that all history is
but the operation of cause and effect?
41. Are students _required_ to seek for causes back of the events?
42. Are students encouraged and expected to _trace causes_ through the
various sequences of effects?
IX. _Methods of Approach to the Study of History._
1. Chronologically, since there is a continuity in the subject, and
cause precedes effect. "The childhood of history is best for the child,
the boyhood of history for the boy, the youthhood of history for the
youth, and the manhood of history for the man."--_S. S. Laurie_,
Sch. Rev. 4:650.
2. Counter-chronologically, i.e., from the present time and immediate
surroundings to remote ages and distant peoples.
3. Spirally, i.e., covering the entire field of study in an elementary
manner; then repeating the course on a more advanced plane; then taking
up the work a third and fourth time, supplementing and expanding with
each new attack.
4. Biographically, i.e., by means of biographies only.
5. Topically, i.e., tracing the development of particular elements in
history, continuously and uninterruptedly, from the early stages to
complete forms.
QUERIES
1. Which, to you, seems the best approach to the study of history?
2. May several of the above-mentioned modes be employed simultaneously?
3. Is it largely true that the personal or biographic appeals most to
the child; the speculative, to the boy; the vitally and concretely
constructive, to the youth; and the critical and philosophical to the
adult? If so, what should be the character of the work in history in
the high school?
X. _The Process of Learning History._
1. Acquiring and relating detailed facts.
2. Formulating a mental picture of the events.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account