A guide to the history of physical educationLeonard, Fred Eugene
History
A guide to the history of physical education
Leonard, Fred Eugene
Physical education and training; Physical education and training -- History
Like many another German student, Follen had come back from the war
filled with ideas of moral and social reform. In place of the provincial
clubs (_Landsmannschaften_), with their carousing and the duel as their
only arbiter of quarrels, he desired to see the entire student body
united in one Christian brotherhood, with no distinctions of class or
rank, ruled by the will of the majority determined in open assembly after
free discussion, and settling all disputes according to the principles
of right and justice. The purity of his own life and the moral greatness
of his character, the eloquence with which he urged his views, and his
confident enthusiasm soon won a following of like-minded friends, in
whose eyes he took on the dignity of a very prophet. The first motion
toward union was taken in the late summer of 1816. A few days after
the following Christmas, at a general gathering of students, a formal
“code of honor” (_Ehrenspiegel_), Follen’s work in great part, was
proposed. A majority of those present evinced their hostility to the
project by withdrawing at once; but about sixty who remained organized
themselves into an association, under Follen’s leadership. Looked upon
with suspicion by the authorities on account of their liberal tendencies,
hated and proscribed by a majority of the students, who nicknamed
them “Blacks” (_Schwarzen_) from the dark clothing they affected and
their somber demeanor, the reformers became only more extreme and
uncompromising in their attitude. Reaching far beyond the bounds of
the university, their plans already contemplated a great Christian
republic formed of freed and united Germany. Tyranny was to be met with
resistance, and Follen now taught that armed insurrection, and even
perjury and assassination, were justified when other measures failed in
the struggle for popular freedom. Some of the Blacks drew back at this,
but others, known as “Unconditionals” in contrast with the “Moderates,”
were undismayed at the radical doctrines of their revered leader.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account