A Half Century Among the Siamese and the Lāo: An AutobiographyMcGilvary, Daniel
History
A Half Century Among the Siamese and the Lāo: An Autobiography
McGilvary, Daniel
Lao (Tai people); Missions -- Lao (Tai people); Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. -- Missions
It is moreover strictly enjoined on Princes and Rulers, and on
relatives and friends of those who wish to become Christians,
that they throw no obstacles in their way, and that no one
enforce any creed or work which their religion forbids them to
hold or to do—such as the worship and feasting of demons, and
working on the Sabbath day, except in the case of war and other
great unavoidable works, which, however, must not be a mere
pretence, but really important. Be it further observed that they
are to have free and unobstructed observance of the Sabbath day.
And no obstacle is to be thrown in the way of American citizens
employing such persons as they may need, since such would be a
breach of the treaty between the two countries.
Whenever this Proclamation is made known to the Princes and
Rulers and Officers and People, they are to beware and violate
no precept contained therein.
Proclamation made on the Thirteenth Day of the Eleventh waxing
Moon, in the Eleventh Year of His Majesty’s Reign, October the
Eighth, Eighteen Hundred and Seventy-Eight.
The Edict furnishes a second natural division in the history of the Lāo
mission. Its first period was one of struggle for its very existence,
culminating in positive prohibition to preach the gospel and virtual
expulsion of the missionaries. That situation was abruptly brought to an
end by the death of Prince Kāwilōrot and the appointment of his
son-in-law, Prince Intanon. In our second period of struggle, the
conclusion of which we have just witnessed, the conditions were in many
respects similar to those of the first. Our chief antagonists in the two
contests were alike in their love of absolute power, in their
determination to break down all rival influences, and alike, therefore,
in their settled hostility to our work. In neither case was their
antagonism to Christianity primarily on religious grounds. But Kāwilōrot
was of much more imposing personality and figure than the Uparāt.
Within his own realm Kāwilōrot was really “Lord of Life.” He was
absolute head both of church and of state. He brooked no rival and no
contradiction in either. The highest positions in the religious
hierarchy were bestowed or withdrawn at his pleasure. His own
brothers-in-law languished in exile in Siam, because it was not thought
safe for them to return and be within his reach. At home he had
vanquished or terrified into submission all possible rivals. Even the
court of Siam seemed inspired with a wholesome fear of meddling with
him. The crime of the first Christians was the unpardonable one that
they had dared to become such against the will of Kāwilōrot. But the
time and place for such rulers had passed. Such attitude and temper
suited neither a position under superior authority, nor the policy of a
government striving to rise with the progress of the age. But he served
his purpose in the world, and Providence used him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account