A Half Century Among the Siamese and the Lāo: An Autobiography — John Shaqi
A Half Century Among the Siamese and the Lāo: An AutobiographyMcGilvary, Daniel
History
A Half Century Among the Siamese and the Lāo: An Autobiography
McGilvary, Daniel
Lao (Tai people); Missions -- Lao (Tai people); Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. -- Missions
Taking Mr. McDonald and Mr. George with us, we proceeded next to the
United States Consulate, where Mr. Hood readily agreed to give his
official and personal aid. The two greatest obstacles remained yet: the
Siamese government and—as it turned out in the end—the Lāo Prince[7]
also. The Consul wrote immediately to the King, through our former
Pechaburī friend, who had recently been made Foreign Minister, a formal
request for permission to open a station in Chiengmai. It was Friday
evening when the reply came that the decision did not rest with the
King. He could not force a mission upon the Lāo people. But the Lāo
Prince was then in Bangkok. If he gave his consent, the Siamese
government would give theirs. He suggested that we have an audience with
the Prince, at which His Majesty would have an officer in attendance to
report directly to him.
Footnote 7:
The Lāo ruler was a feudal vassal of the King of Siam, governing an
important frontier province, and granted, within that province, some
of the powers which are usually thought of as belonging to
sovereignty—notably the power of life and death in the case of his
immediate subjects. His title, Pra Chao, like its English parallel,
Lord, he shared with the deity as well as with kings; though the Kings
of Siam claim the added designation, “_Yū Hūa_,” “at the head,” or
“Sovereign.” By the early missionaries, however, he was regularly
styled “King,” a term which to us misrepresents his real status, and
which leads to much confusion both of personality and of function.
Meantime both title and function have vanished with the feudal order
of which they were a part, leaving us free to seek for our narrative a
less misleading term. Such a term seems to be the word Prince, thus
defined in Murray’s Dictionary (_s. v._ II. 5):—“The ruler of a
principality or small state, actually, nominally, or originally, a
feudatory of a king or emperor.” The capital initial should suffice
generally to distinguish the Prince who is ruler from princes who are
such merely by accident of birth.—ED.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account