397); but a diagonal position of the calyx generally
shows that the flower is not, strictly speaking, tetramerous, as in
_Plantago_ (Fig. 567), _Veronica_ (Fig. 559 _C_) and others.
If the bracteoles are _not_ typically present, then the position of the
sepals is changed accordingly, and the two outer sepals endeavour to
assume the position which the bracteoles would otherwise have occupied,
_e.g._ in _Primula_ (Fig. 547). Other positions are also found when the
number of bracteoles is more or less than two.
The leaves which follow the sepals occupy definite positions with
regard to them, which we may consider later. An arrangement must,
however, be mentioned here; when the flower is “_diplostemonous_” that
is, has two whorls of stamens (thus, Sn, Pn, An + n), these may be
arranged in two ways. _Either_ the first-formed whorl of stamens, which
are termed the “calyx-stamens,” stands directly in front of the sepals
(that is “episepalous”), and is the _outermost_ whorl, and in this case
a regular alternation takes place between sepals, petals and the two
whorls of stamens, which is also continued into the carpels if their
number is the same as that of the other whorls: the carpels are then
placed opposite the sepals (Fig. 278) and the flower is _isomerous_
and Gn should be added to the formula above. _Or_, the calyx-stamens
form the _innermost_ whorl, and the corolla-stamens, which are
subsequently formed (“epipetalous” stamens), stand _outside_ these
(Figs. 360, 429); if the number of carpels is the same as that of the
preceding whorls, they are often placed _right in front_ of the petals
and the corolla-stamens. The first-mentioned arrangement is termed
_Diplostemonous_, and the second _Obdiplostemonous_. ~Both arrangements
may be found in one and the same order, _e.g._ Caryophyllaceæ. The
size and relation of the members of the flowers, and also the contact
with other members in the early stages of their development, play an
important part in determining the arrangement.~
The great number of structural arrangements found in this enormously
large class, may, as is the case in the Monocotyledons, be further
varied by _suppression and division_ of certain leaves (especially the
stamens). Instances of this will occur in the following (Figs. 559,
568.--426, 441, 445, etc.).
The Dicotyledons were formerly divided into 3 sub-classes: Apetalæ
(those without corolla), Sympetalæ or Gamopetalæ (those with the petals
united), and Choripetalæ or Polypetalæ (the petals not united). This
division has now been abandoned because it has been proved that the
Apetalæ were merely reduced or incomplete forms of the Choripetalæ, and
they have therefore been distributed among the various families of the
latter sub-class.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account