A History of Art in Ancient Egypt, Vol. 1 (of 2)Perrot, Georges
History
A History of Art in Ancient Egypt, Vol. 1 (of 2)
Perrot, Georges
Art -- Egypt -- History; Egypt -- Antiquities
[245] This must have been the structure which STRABO calls the
_Memnonium_, and near to which he seems to place the two colossi
(xvii. p. 816). The true name of the author of both temple and
colossi might easily be confused with that of the mythical Greek
personage which the Hellenic imagination persisted in
discovering everywhere in Egypt, and the similarity of sound
must have helped to perpetuate the mistake among all the foreign
travellers who visited the country. A curious passage in
PAUSANIAS (_Attica_, 42) shows us, however, that the Egyptian
scholars of his time knew how properly to convey the name of the
prince represented in the colossi to foreigners: "I was less
struck by that marvel," he says, in speaking of some sonorous
stone which was shown to him at Megara, "than by a colossal
statue which I saw beyond the Nile in Egypt, not far from the
_pipes_. This colossus is a statue of the sun, or of Memnon,
according to the common tradition. It is said that Memnon came
from Ethiopia into Egypt, and that he penetrated as far as Susa.
But the Thebans themselves deny that it is Memnon. They declare
that it represents Phamenoph (Φάμενοφ), who was born in their
own country...." The story told by PHILOSTRATUS (_Life of
Apollonius_, l. vi. p. 232) of the visit of the sorcerer to
Memnon, shows that in his time the colossus was surrounded by
nothing but ruins, such as broken columns and architraves,
fragmentary walls and shattered statues. Even then the
monumental completeness of the "Amenophium" had vanished.
Only one of those Theban temples which rise upon the left bank of the
river is free from all trace of a funerary or commemorative purpose,
namely, the temple at Medinet-Abou which bears the ovals of Thothmes
II. and Thothmes III. It shows signs, moreover, of having been
frequently enlarged and added to, some of the additions having been
made as recently as in the time of the Roman Emperors. In this respect
it resembles, in spite of its comparatively small size, the great
temples upon the right bank of the river. Like them, its creation was
a gradual and impersonal matter. Every century added its stone, and
each successive king engraved his name upon its walls. How to account
for its exceptional situation we do not know. It is possible that
those funerary temples of which we have spoken were an original
invention of the successors of Thothmes; perhaps that constructed by
Hatasu at Dayr-el-Bahari was the first of the series.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account