A History of Art in Ancient Egypt, Vol. 2 (of 2)Perrot, Georges
History
A History of Art in Ancient Egypt, Vol. 2 (of 2)
Perrot, Georges
Art -- Egypt -- History; Egypt -- Antiquities
[42] We have been able to make use, for this reconstruction, of
two plans which only differ in details, and otherwise mutually
corroborate each other. One is given by LEPSIUS, Plate 111, vol.
ii. of his _Denkmæler_; the plans of the two fortresses are in
the middle of his map of the valley where they occur. In plate
112 we have a pictorial view of the ruins and the ground about
them. In the _Bulletin archéologique de l'Athenæum Français_
(1855, pp. 80-84, and plate 5), M. VOGÜÉ also published a plan
of the two forts, accompanied by a section and a description
giving valuable details, details which Lepsius, in his _Briefe
aus Ægypten_, passed over in silence.
Our view of the fort shows it as it must have appeared from a hill in
the Libyan Chain, to the south-west. The engineer lavished all his
skill on rendering the castle impregnable from the side of the
desert. An attack upon the flank facing the stream was impossible; on
that side the walls rested upon precipitous rocks rising sheer from
the rapids of the Nile.
The trace of the walls was a polygon not unlike a capital L. The
principal arm was perpendicular to the course of the river. Its flat
summit (see Fig. 30) was about 250 feet by 190 feet. The interior was
reached by a narrow passage in the thickness of the masonry, the
entrance to which was reached by an inclined plane. The entrance is
not visible in our illustration but the incline which leads to it is
shown. The walls on the three sides which looked landwards were from
fifty to eighty feet high, according to the ground. They increased in
thickness from twenty-six feet at the base to about twelve or thirteen
at the summit. Externally their upper parts fell backwards in such
fashion that no ladder, however high, would have availed to reach the
parapet. We find a similar arrangement in the walls of a fortress
represented at Beni-Hassan (Fig. 31).[43]
[43] In this case the inclination is, however, in the lower half
of the wall; a device which would be far less efficient in
defeating an escalade than that at Semneh.--ED.
[Illustration: FIG. 31.--A besieged fort, Beni-Hassan; from
Champollion, pl. 379.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
A History of Art in Ancient Egypt, Vol. 2 (of 2) — John Shaqi
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account